Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Now a full decade in publication, White & Case's 2025 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continues to provide a comprehensive look at foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations across various countries and regions worldwide.
In this edition, we continue to offer key datapoints that can help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the new set of challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions that span multiple countries.
FDI screening is continuously evolving, in fact, maturing. It is imperative to stay on top of the FDI requirements as transactions—be it mergers and acquisitions, investments, public equity offerings, or financial restructurings—are negotiated. Understanding the challenges, the potential remedies that could be required for approval and the proper allocation of FDI risk are key ingredients in avoiding unpleasant surprises related to timing, certainty and business plan execution.
With a new administration in the United States, a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, increased EU FDI cooperation, and the new geo-political lines and balances that are being drawn, the dynamics around FDI screening will be a driving consideration in the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully consummated in 2025, but understanding the evolving risks around FDI considerations will be critical.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Foreign direct investments, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, are generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
In the US, most FDI deals are approved without mitigation, but the landscape is evolving based on a combination of expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, increased rates of mitigation, further attention to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions.
The European Commission continues to be a driver of FDI screening across the EU, with Member States now moving toward coordinated enforcement.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and extensive interpretation of the Austrian FDI regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning of the M&A process.
The Belgian FDI screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidelines that help parties navigate it.
In 2024, Bulgaria established an FDI screening mechanism. Foreign investors' obligation to file for investment clearance did not become effective in 2024, but this should change soon.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive, and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia's FDI screening mechanism closed its first effective year in 2024.
FDI deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French FDI screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's FDI review continued in full swing in 2024, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Hungarian FDI regulation stands as a rock amid global economic storms, although there were few major changes in 2024.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review more tan ten years old and continuously expanding its reach.
The law in Latvia provides for sectoral FDI regimes for specific corporate M&A, real estate dealings and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review in Lithuania.
The Luxembourg FDI screening regime is now a year old, and the first notification filings have been made.
Malta's FDI regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may potentially be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment regime is in the process of being expanded, with more profound changes expected in the future.
After revision of the Polish FDI regime in 2024, the way the authorities are assessing transactions is evolving.
In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared to other EU countries, the Romanian FDI regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2024 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course taken earlier in 2023.
After two years of foreign investment regulation in Slovakia, a supportive climate for foreign investments remains.
Slovenia's updated FDI regime now extends to branch offices and introduces new challenges for foreign investors navigating critical sectors.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments are subject to scrutiny in Spain and, since then, additional formalities have been introduced, specifically by a developing FDI regulation that entered into force on September 1, 2023. The FDI analysis is becoming increasingly crucial in the context of investments in Spain.
In its second year of operation, the Swedish FDI Act has become a standard component of a large portion of all transactions involving Swedish companies.
Apart from limited sector-specific regulations, there is currently no general FDI regime in Switzerland. An FDI Act is expected to come into force in 2026 at the earliest.
Strengthening Türkiye's position as a key investment hub remains a government priority.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
FDI in the UK is covered by the National Security and Investment Act 2021, and in 2024 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's FDI regimes underwent some modifications in 2024, designed to streamline the process of carrying out investments.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, opening up market access and lowering investment thresholds into listed companies.
FDI continues to be an area of focus for the Indian government, which has announced plans to attract further foreign investment into the country.
The Japanese government expands business sectors subject to Japan's FDI regime to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea continues to welcome foreign investment, offering enhanced incentive packages and easing regulations while heightening scrutiny over transactions involving strategic industrial.
New Zealand has recently seen a period of stabilization of the overseas investment regime. However, following the formation of the coalition government at the end of 2023, this government has proposed significant changes to the overseas investment rules for 2025, making it easier for overseas investors to acquire New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote FDI under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign and PRC investors.
In its second year of operation, the Swedish FDI Act has become a standard component of a large portion of all transactions involving Swedish companies.
Explore Trendscape Our take on the interconnected global trends that are shaping the business climate for our clients.
The Swedish FDI Act was implemented in December 2023 and has since provided for screening of investments in so-called protection-worthy businesses, to avoid foreign direct investments that will negatively impact Sweden's national security, public order or public safety. The screening is administrated by the Inspectorate of Strategic Products (Inspektionen för Strategiska Produkter, ISP), and all transactions filed to-date have been approved (some with conditions).
The filing obligation lies with the investor: the legal or natural person carrying out a transaction or otherwise acquiring influence over a protection-worthy business that falls within the scope of the Swedish FDI Act. In general, the investor will be the actual person acquiring the business. For limited liability companies (aktiebolag), the investor will be the person that is to be registered as the owner in the share register of the target company when the investment is completed.
The filing is to be submitted to the ISP. The filing must be made, and approval must be obtained, prior to the closing of an acquisition. It should be noted that if a filing has not been submitted despite there being an obligation to do so, the ISP may issue a fine and decide to review the investment ex officio.
Although the filing obligation lies with the investor, the target company has an obligation to notify the investor that the target company assesses that its business is covered by the Swedish FDI Act, and that the investor accordingly has an obligation to file.
The scope of the Swedish FDI Act encompasses investments pertaining to so-called "protection-worthy activities" (skyddsvärda verksamheter). The Swedish FDI Act sets out an exhaustive list of seven types of activities that are to be considered protection-worthy: essential services; security-sensitive activities; activities relating to critical raw materials or metals, or minerals of strategic importance for Sweden's supply; activities relating to large-scale processing of sensitive personal data or location data; activities relating to military equipment; activities relating to dual-use items; and activities relating to emerging technologies or other strategic protection-worthy technologies.
Supplementary guidelines have been published by certain coordination authorities, specifying the types of businesses considered protection-worthy within the seven types of activities. These cover a wide range of businesses, including activities within sectors relating to infrastructure, electricity, healthcare, transportation, information technology, finance, construction, trade and manufacturing.
Any type of investment in a protection-worthy business must be filed to the ISP if the investor, directly or indirectly, has gained control or influence, or increased its control or influence, of such a business over certain thresholds.
Specifically, an investment carried out in an existing company resulting in the investor holding or exceeding 10, 20, 30, 50, 65 or 90 percent of the votes in the company, as well as an investment resulting in the investor holding 10 percent or more of the votes in a new venture intending to set up a business considered protection-worthy, entail a filing obligation.
A filing obligation also applies on asset deals, investments in a partnership, sole proprietorship, a foundation or a private business activity, and other types of transactions where the investor receives direct or indirect influence over a protection-worthy business. This includes investments resulting in the investor obtaining power to appoint board members or having material veto rights.
There are limited exceptions to the filing obligation, and it should be specifically noted that there is no general exception for investments in listed companies.
The filing obligation applies to all investors, both foreign and domestic. However, only investments made by foreign investors may be scrutinized. A foreign investor is defined as: a natural person with citizenship from a state outside the EU; a legal entity with its registered office in a non-EU country; a legal entity that is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by a state outside the EU; or a legal person directly or indirectly owned or controlled by a legal person established in a state outside the EU or by a natural person having the nationality of such a state.
Within 25 business days from the submission of a complete filing, the ISP will issue a decision to either approve the investment or initiate a further review. An investment by a non-foreign investor, as well as an investment by a foreign investor that does not have a detrimental effect on Sweden's national security, public order or public safety, is left without action.
If an investment is made by a foreign investor, and it cannot be ruled out that the investment may have a detrimental effect on Sweden's national security, public order or public safety, then the ISP has three additional months, with a possible extension of another three months, to further review the investment. The ISP will then issue an approval, a prohibition or an approval subject to certain conditions.
A breach against the Swedish FDI Act may result in a fine for the investor or the target company amounting to between SEK 25,000 (US$2,200) and SEK 100,000,000 (US$8.9 million). To-date, one fine of SEK 200,000 (US$18,000) has been issued for failure to file a transaction falling within the scope of the law. An investment in a non-listed company conducted in violation of the Swedish FDI Act may be nullified, whereas an investment in a listed company may only lead to an order to divest the relevant shares within a certain time.
The scope of the Swedish FDI Act is still, despite the updates made to the supplementary guidelines during 2024, very broad, and there is no clear definition of what constitutes a protection-worthy activity. The legislator has expressed an intention to keep the legislation broad and flexible to cover for changes in the needs of protection of the society. A case-by-case assessment of the target company is therefore recommended in every deal.
An investor who aims to invest in a protection-worthy business should be prepared to disclose information about its ownership structure, and about the target company's business, including services or products offered, assets held, customers, personal data processed, and so on. The ISP may also ask for additional information beyond the initial request, requiring the investor to be responsive in their communications with the authority. The ISP respects requests for confidentiality with regard to information about the investor and the transaction.
Responsibility for the filing lies with the investor, and prior clearance should be a condition precedent of any prospective deal. As investors classified as a foreign investor may be subject to a more in-depth assessment—an assessment period of up to three plus three months—investors should review their ownership structure and assess whether they are classified as a foreign investor in order to predict the timeline of the transaction process. Investors with only domestic or EEA persons in their ownership structure can expect a speedier process and to obtain an approval within 25 business days.
The introduction of the Swedish FDI Act has led to changes in how transaction documents, such as share purchase agreements and investment agreements, are negotiated and drafted, with an increased focus on FDI-related conditions precedent.
It seems likely this trend will continue, along with the trend for the ISP to only initiate in-depth reviews of a small minority of transactions filed.
Looking ahead into the second year of application of the Swedish FDI Act, it is expected that Swedish FDI screenings will continue to be an important component in direct and indirect investments in Swedish businesses, impacting the transaction process as well as the transaction documents.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2025 White & Case LLP