Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Now a full decade in publication, White & Case's 2025 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continues to provide a comprehensive look at foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations across various countries and regions worldwide.
In this edition, we continue to offer key datapoints that can help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the new set of challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions that span multiple countries.
FDI screening is continuously evolving, in fact, maturing. It is imperative to stay on top of the FDI requirements as transactions—be it mergers and acquisitions, investments, public equity offerings, or financial restructurings—are negotiated. Understanding the challenges, the potential remedies that could be required for approval and the proper allocation of FDI risk are key ingredients in avoiding unpleasant surprises related to timing, certainty and business plan execution.
With a new administration in the United States, a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, increased EU FDI cooperation, and the new geo-political lines and balances that are being drawn, the dynamics around FDI screening will be a driving consideration in the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully consummated in 2025, but understanding the evolving risks around FDI considerations will be critical.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Foreign direct investments, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, are generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
In the US, most FDI deals are approved without mitigation, but the landscape is evolving based on a combination of expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, increased rates of mitigation, further attention to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions.
The European Commission continues to be a driver of FDI screening across the EU, with Member States now moving toward coordinated enforcement.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and extensive interpretation of the Austrian FDI regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning of the M&A process.
The Belgian FDI screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidelines that help parties navigate it.
In 2024, Bulgaria established an FDI screening mechanism. Foreign investors' obligation to file for investment clearance did not become effective in 2024, but this should change soon.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive, and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia's FDI screening mechanism closed its first effective year in 2024.
FDI deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French FDI screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's FDI review continued in full swing in 2024, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Hungarian FDI regulation stands as a rock amid global economic storms, although there were few major changes in 2024.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review more tan ten years old and continuously expanding its reach.
The law in Latvia provides for sectoral FDI regimes for specific corporate M&A, real estate dealings and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review in Lithuania.
The Luxembourg FDI screening regime is now a year old, and the first notification filings have been made.
Malta's FDI regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may potentially be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment regime is in the process of being expanded, with more profound changes expected in the future.
After revision of the Polish FDI regime in 2024, the way the authorities are assessing transactions is evolving.
In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared to other EU countries, the Romanian FDI regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2024 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course taken earlier in 2023.
After two years of foreign investment regulation in Slovakia, a supportive climate for foreign investments remains.
Slovenia's updated FDI regime now extends to branch offices and introduces new challenges for foreign investors navigating critical sectors.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments are subject to scrutiny in Spain and, since then, additional formalities have been introduced, specifically by a developing FDI regulation that entered into force on September 1, 2023. The FDI analysis is becoming increasingly crucial in the context of investments in Spain.
In its second year of operation, the Swedish FDI Act has become a standard component of a large portion of all transactions involving Swedish companies.
Apart from limited sector-specific regulations, there is currently no general FDI regime in Switzerland. An FDI Act is expected to come into force in 2026 at the earliest.
Strengthening Türkiye's position as a key investment hub remains a government priority.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
FDI in the UK is covered by the National Security and Investment Act 2021, and in 2024 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's FDI regimes underwent some modifications in 2024, designed to streamline the process of carrying out investments.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, opening up market access and lowering investment thresholds into listed companies.
FDI continues to be an area of focus for the Indian government, which has announced plans to attract further foreign investment into the country.
The Japanese government expands business sectors subject to Japan's FDI regime to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea continues to welcome foreign investment, offering enhanced incentive packages and easing regulations while heightening scrutiny over transactions involving strategic industrial.
New Zealand has recently seen a period of stabilization of the overseas investment regime. However, following the formation of the coalition government at the end of 2023, this government has proposed significant changes to the overseas investment rules for 2025, making it easier for overseas investors to acquire New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote FDI under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign and PRC investors.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review more than ten years old and continuously expanding its reach.
Explore Trendscape
Our take on the interconnected global trends that are shaping the business climate for our clients.
The Italian FDI regime is also known as the "Golden Power Law" or "Golden Power regime" in Italy, as it gives the Italian government "golden" or special powers to approve or veto FDIs. Since 2012, the Italian government has reviewed all transactions relating to Italian companies that carry out strategic activities or hold assets with strategic relevance in certain sectors deemed critical for Italy. In the past five years, FDI control has expanded to further protect Italian strategic assets against potentially predatory transactions.
The Golden Power filing must be made by any company adopting a resolution or taking any action in connection with a strategic company transaction including: asset sales; mergers and demergers; transfer of headquarters outside of Italian territory; creation of securities or assignment by way of security of the strategic assets or changes to the corporate purpose, which would result in a change of ownership, availability or use of strategic assets; or by the purchaser, jointly with the target company, in connection with the direct or indirect acquisition of an equity or debt interest, or the voting rights in a target company holding strategic assets under the Golden Power Law.
In addition to applying to non-Italian and non-EU persons, the Golden Power Law and relevant filing obligation may also apply to Italian and EU persons depending on the relevant strategic business sector and the type of transaction subject to notification and review.
Under the Golden Power Law, FDI clearance is mandatory for any strategic company transaction carried out in the defense and national security sectors by any investor. It is also mandatory in the energy, transportation, communication, health, agri-food and financial (including credit and insurance) sectors—referred to as "key other sectors" —by any EU (including Italian) investor; and in strategic sectors other than defense and security and 5G technology, but including the key other sectors, by any non-EU investor. Each case is subject to defined thresholds.
Clearance is also mandatory for a transaction resulting in the assignment by guarantee of the strategic assets in any strategic sector, as well as for the incorporation of a new entity operating in defense or national security. It is also mandatory in any other strategic sector if a non-EU investor holds at least 10 percent of the share capital of the new entity.
Clearance must be sought for the strategic acquisition of an equity interest exceeding certain thresholds—currently 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 50 percent—by any investor, other than the Italian state or any Italian public or publicly controlled entity, for the defense and national security sectors; or a controlling interest by any EU (including Italian) investor, for any key other sector.
Strategic acquisitions involving a controlling interest, or at least 10 percent of the corporate capital or voting rights—and any subsequent acquisition exceeding 15, 20, 25 and 50 percent—as long as the investment value is equal to or exceeds €1 million, by any non-EU investor, for any other sector; or agreements involving the acquisition of, or the provision of services in connection with, 5G technology, solely to the extent that non-EU investors are involved, must also be cleared.
The implementing decrees of the Golden Power Law set out the strategic businesses and assets falling within the industrial sectors subject to FDI review. However, the scope of "industrial sectors" remains broadly defined.
In the defense and national security sectors, all businesses operating in the sector or businesses producing dual-use products with revenues of at least €300 million are covered by the law.
In the energy sector, the law covers platforms for the supply of energy and gas; critical infrastructure and real estate connected to the nuclear and oil & gas sectors; and businesses operating in the energy sector with revenues of at least €300 million and employing at least 250 workers.
Transactions involving businesses providing essential infrastructure for the safekeeping of the state's well-being and vital functions in the critical infrastructure, transportation and telecommunications and aerospace sectors are also caught under the Golden Power Law.
Critical technologies in the financial, insurance and credit sectors, or businesses operating in the financial, insurance and credit sectors with revenues of at least €300 million and employing at least 250 workers, are covered, as are registered media companies.
Within the critical technologies sector, essential technologies for the safekeeping of the state's well-being, vital functions and economic progress, are included, such as AI, module-to-module communication, cybersecurity, nanotechnologies, biotechnologies, aerospace and robotics.
The healthcare and pharmaceuticals sector includes critical healthcare technologies; businesses operating in this sector with revenues of at least €300 million and employing at least 250 workers; or strategic resources for the supply of medicines, medical devices and other medical equipment, and critical diagnostic technologies.
Other industries covered by the Golden Power Law include the supply of critical inputs (including critical raw materials); agri-food; essential goods and services for the safekeeping of the state's wel-lbeing and vital functions, including steel, semiconductors and so on; strategic supply chain activities; access to sensitive data and essential information for the safekeeping of the state's well-being and vital functions; and all transactions involving 5G technologies.
Filings shall occur within 10 days after the execution of a binding agreement, or the adoption of a relevant corporate resolution.
The review period is 45 business days, or 30 days for filings relating to 5G technologies, during which the transaction cannot be completed and any voting rights with respect to the transaction are frozen until clearance is given. It may be extended only once, for a maximum of 10 or 20 additional days if the Italian government requests additional information from the filing person or from a third party. If the review period expires without any response from the Italian government, the notification is deemed tacitly cleared (silenzio assenso).
The review period may be extended twice for a maximum period of 20 additional business days per each extension, exclusively with reference to filings relating to 5G technologies.
The review period is suspended for up to 35 days from receipt of the notification if an EU Member State or the European Commission decides to review the transaction, until the observations or opinion of the relevant EU Member State or the Commission have been delivered—unless further extended to receive additional information.
If the Italian government initiates a Golden Power review independently in the absence of a filing, the review period will start from the date the Italian government determines that a breach of the filing obligation has occurred.
In addition, a pre-notification or pre-signing procedure is available, enabling any company to file a voluntary pre-notification based on the information available as of the date of the pre-filing. Within 30 days of the pre-filing, the government must complete an assessment with one of the following outcomes: out of scope, in which case no filing is due; in scope, in which a case filing is due; or in scope but evident that no special powers will be exercised, in which case no filing is due. If there is no response by the Italian government within the 30-day review period, no tacit clearance mechanism applies, and a full formal notification will have to be filed.
The first step for foreign investors interested in entering into a transaction in relation to any Italian company operating (or arguably operating) in any strategic sector should be an evaluation of whether a filing under the Golden Power Law is required. This analysis should be undertaken as soon as possible and in any event before entering into the transaction, to limit unnecessary costs.
The Golden Power Law operates on a principle of substance over form. It follows that when structuring a transaction, the creation of corporate, fiduciary or contractual investment structures will not limit the applicability of the Golden Power regime if the ultimate beneficial investor falls within its scope of application. Therefore, it is crucial for foreign investors, including potential passive investors, to consider the risk that, if a transaction falls within the scope of the Golden Power Law, the Italian government could veto, condition, or make material recommendations with respect to the transaction.
Similar considerations apply in the structuring of secured financing transactions involving the creation of a direct or indirect pledge or security over any Italian entity or asset that is deemed strategic and falls within the scope of application of the Italian Golden Power Law and regulations.
Given the broad and imprecise applicability of the Golden Power Law and its implementing decrees, investors, when the timing of the transaction allows, should consider using the newly introduced pre-notification procedure to help reduce uncertainty.
Moreover, the extension of the Golden Power Law to certain intra-group transactions and reorganizations requires investors to take a more cautious approach when assessing if any such internal transactions could be of strategic relevance.
Before entering into any acquisition agreements, it is key that foreign investors consider the filing—and pre-filing, if applicable—timeline. Filing obligation terms, long-stop dates, hell-or-high-water covenants and regulatory clearance closing conditions in acquisition documentation must take into account the latest timelines and conditions relating to the Golden Power Law, as amended from time to time by the Italian legislature.
Amendments to the Golden Power Law, enacted in recent years, have caused numerous complex interpretational issues, including due to the extremely broad definition of the strategic sectors falling under FDI control.
This has led business actors to proceed with increasingly frequent precautionary filings to the Italian government, resulting in a significant shift in the number of filings over recent years—from approximately 651 known filings (including 43 pre-filings) made in 2022 to 727 filings (including 150 pre-filings) in 2023, representing an increase of approximately 11.7 per cent with respect to the previous year. Of these, intra-group transactions represent 12 percent of total filings.
The need to notify an increasing number of transactions, including in connection with pledge creation and intra-group transactions, will in turn lead to increased transaction costs for investors and prolonged timeframes for deal completion. In addition, a number of transactions, such as refinancing transactions including pledge extensions or establishment, or portfolio companies' reorganizations, would not have been captured by FDI scrutiny before the latest developments.
In this respect, the new pre-notification procedure should be considered a tool to limit uncertainty, provided the assessment on the possible impacts of the Golden Power Law on the relevant transaction is carried out early on in the process.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2025 White & Case LLP