Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Now a full decade in publication, White & Case's 2025 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continues to provide a comprehensive look at foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations across various countries and regions worldwide.
In this edition, we continue to offer key datapoints that can help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the new set of challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions that span multiple countries.
FDI screening is continuously evolving, in fact, maturing. It is imperative to stay on top of the FDI requirements as transactions—be it mergers and acquisitions, investments, public equity offerings, or financial restructurings—are negotiated. Understanding the challenges, the potential remedies that could be required for approval and the proper allocation of FDI risk are key ingredients in avoiding unpleasant surprises related to timing, certainty and business plan execution.
With a new administration in the United States, a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, increased EU FDI cooperation, and the new geo-political lines and balances that are being drawn, the dynamics around FDI screening will be a driving consideration in the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully consummated in 2025, but understanding the evolving risks around FDI considerations will be critical.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Foreign direct investments, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, are generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
In the US, most FDI deals are approved without mitigation, but the landscape is evolving based on a combination of expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, increased rates of mitigation, further attention to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions.
The European Commission continues to be a driver of FDI screening across the EU, with Member States now moving toward coordinated enforcement.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and extensive interpretation of the Austrian FDI regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning of the M&A process.
The Belgian FDI screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidelines that help parties navigate it.
In 2024, Bulgaria established an FDI screening mechanism. Foreign investors' obligation to file for investment clearance did not become effective in 2024, but this should change soon.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive, and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia's FDI screening mechanism closed its first effective year in 2024.
FDI deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French FDI screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's FDI review continued in full swing in 2024, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Hungarian FDI regulation stands as a rock amid global economic storms, although there were few major changes in 2024.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review more tan ten years old and continuously expanding its reach.
The law in Latvia provides for sectoral FDI regimes for specific corporate M&A, real estate dealings and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review in Lithuania.
The Luxembourg FDI screening regime is now a year old, and the first notification filings have been made.
Malta's FDI regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may potentially be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment regime is in the process of being expanded, with more profound changes expected in the future.
After revision of the Polish FDI regime in 2024, the way the authorities are assessing transactions is evolving.
In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared to other EU countries, the Romanian FDI regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2024 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course taken earlier in 2023.
After two years of foreign investment regulation in Slovakia, a supportive climate for foreign investments remains.
Slovenia's updated FDI regime now extends to branch offices and introduces new challenges for foreign investors navigating critical sectors.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments are subject to scrutiny in Spain and, since then, additional formalities have been introduced, specifically by a developing FDI regulation that entered into force on September 1, 2023. The FDI analysis is becoming increasingly crucial in the context of investments in Spain.
In its second year of operation, the Swedish FDI Act has become a standard component of a large portion of all transactions involving Swedish companies.
Apart from limited sector-specific regulations, there is currently no general FDI regime in Switzerland. An FDI Act is expected to come into force in 2026 at the earliest.
Strengthening Türkiye's position as a key investment hub remains a government priority.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
FDI in the UK is covered by the National Security and Investment Act 2021, and in 2024 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's FDI regimes underwent some modifications in 2024, designed to streamline the process of carrying out investments.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, opening up market access and lowering investment thresholds into listed companies.
FDI continues to be an area of focus for the Indian government, which has announced plans to attract further foreign investment into the country.
The Japanese government expands business sectors subject to Japan's FDI regime to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea continues to welcome foreign investment, offering enhanced incentive packages and easing regulations while heightening scrutiny over transactions involving strategic industrial.
New Zealand has recently seen a period of stabilization of the overseas investment regime. However, following the formation of the coalition government at the end of 2023, this government has proposed significant changes to the overseas investment rules for 2025, making it easier for overseas investors to acquire New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote FDI under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign and PRC investors.
Slovenia's updated FDI regime now extends to branch offices and introduces new challenges for foreign investors navigating critical sectors.
Explore Trendscape Our take on the interconnected global trends that are shaping the business climate for our clients.
Matej Črnilec and Špela Lovšin (Schönherr Attorneys at Law) authored this publication.
The current Slovenian FDI control regulation, effective from July 1, 2023, has already been amended twice. Despite amendments, the Ministry of the Economy, Tourism, and Sport's inconsistent interpretation of critical sectors and non-disclosure of decisions create uncertainty, complicating the assessment of notification obligations for foreign investments.
Foreign investors are required to notify their investment if specific criteria are met.
A foreign investor is defined as an individual or an entity from a non-EU country that: intends to make or has already made a direct foreign investment in Slovenia; holds, directly or indirectly, at least 10 per- cent of the capital or voting rights in a business entity established in an EU Member State and intends to make, or has already made, a direct foreign investment in Slovenia.
The notification may also be submitted by the target company or the foreign investor's subsidiary in Slovenia.
Failure to notify within the prescribed deadline can result in fines of up to €500,000 for the foreign investor. Notably, there is no filing fee for the notification process.
The Ministry of the Economy, Tourism, and Sport is the competent authority overseeing FDI reviews.
The following types of transactions by foreign investors are caught by the Slovenian FDI Control Rules: direct or indirect acquisitions of at least 10 percent in share capital or voting rights in a corporate entity registered in Slovenia; and investment in tangible or intangible assets for the establishment of a new corporate entity in Slovenia whereby the foreign investor acquires, directly or indirectly, at least 10 percent in share capital or voting rights of a newly established legal entity in Slovenia.
The obligation to notify a foreign investment only applies if the transaction also concerns a "critical sector" in accordance with the Slovenian FDI Control Rules. As long as an interest of at least 10 per- cent is acquired and the transaction concerns one of the critical sectors, the filing requirement applies, even if the acquisition does not confer control.
Transactions concerning internal reorganization within a corporate group should be assessed on a case-by-case basis to determine a potential notification obligation.
When assessing the potential impact of an FDI on security or public order, the ministry will consider a number of factors.
These include whether, and the extent to which, the foreign investor is directly or indirectly controlled by the government, including state bodies or armed forces, of a third country through ownership structure or significant funding.
The ministry also considers any previous involvement of the foreign investor in activities affecting security or public order in an EU Member State; the likelihood of the foreign investor engaging in illegal or criminal activities; whether the foreign investor has met acquisition thresholds in the target company, such as one-third of voting rights, a 10 percent share of voting rights after a takeover bid, or at least 75 percent of total voting shares through a successful takeover bid; the presence of a market share of at least 20 percent in critical activities in Slovenia through the target company or a newly established entity; and the level of participation the foreign investor has achieved in the capital or voting rights of the target company.
After the FDI notification is filed, the FDI Commission within the ministry performs a prima facie review, known as phase I. It may issue an opinion that the transaction does not fall within the scope of the Slovenian FDI Control Rules; the transaction does not raise serious concern from the perspective of the Slovenian FDI Control Rules; or the transaction raises serious concerns, in which case it proposes the commencement of a screening procedure.
The law does not specify a deadline for the phase I decision; however, general rules on administrative procedure apply, requiring the phase I decision to be issued within two months from the complete notification. The vast majority of cases are cleared in phase I.
If FDI screening proceedings—phase II—are initiated, the FDI Expert Group within the ministry must deliver an opinion within two years from the date of the transaction or the entry of the newly established legal entity in the court register. Based on the FDI Expert Group's opinion, the ministry should within an additional two months approve the transaction (with or without conditions), or prohibit the transaction.
The regime is still relatively new, and the ministry has so far stressed on several occasions that the purpose of the law is not to discourage foreign investments, as in practice only a marginal number of notified transactions will be reviewed. However, the ministry's interpretation of critical sectors has been inconsistent in the past three years and, hence, there is no clear guidance as to which targets or business activities fall within such sectors.
Given this uncertainty and the fact that the ministry's decisions are not publicly disclosed, assessing notification obligation can be challenging. Thus, investors are encouraged to proceed with caution.
While the notification does not have suspensive effects and no standstill obligation applies, investors may—in FDI-sensitive transactions—consider including in the transaction documents a closing condition precedent related to the obtaining of FDI approval in Slovenia.
Foreign investors should also take into account that the law imposes an unusually long deadline for the completion of the phase II review procedure, if initiated. Hence, for phase II candidates' pre-alignment with the authority should be considered.
It is also important to note that the ministry may initiate the review procedure and potentially annul the transaction later on—within two years as of the conclusion of the transaction or of the registration of the establishment of a company in the Slovenian court register—if it obtains information that a foreign investor who has made an FDI in Slovenia is engaged in activities in critical business sectors, which have affected or are likely to affect the security or public order of an EU Member State or is engaged in illegal or criminal activities. However, to-date we are not aware of any case of the authority enforcing this option.
There are no legislative proposals currently pending regarding the existing FDI regime. However, it is anticipated that secondary legislation specifying in more detail the form of the FDI notification may be adopted subsequently.
This secondary legislation could provide clearer guidelines and standardized procedures for filing FDI notifications, thereby reducing ambiguity and ensuring a more streamlined process. Additionally, the adoption of such secondary legislation may address existing gaps and inconsistencies in the current framework.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2025 White & Case LLP