Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Now a full decade in publication, White & Case's 2025 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continues to provide a comprehensive look at foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations across various countries and regions worldwide.
In this edition, we continue to offer key datapoints that can help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the new set of challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions that span multiple countries.
FDI screening is continuously evolving, in fact, maturing. It is imperative to stay on top of the FDI requirements as transactions—be it mergers and acquisitions, investments, public equity offerings, or financial restructurings—are negotiated. Understanding the challenges, the potential remedies that could be required for approval and the proper allocation of FDI risk are key ingredients in avoiding unpleasant surprises related to timing, certainty and business plan execution.
With a new administration in the United States, a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, increased EU FDI cooperation, and the new geo-political lines and balances that are being drawn, the dynamics around FDI screening will be a driving consideration in the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully consummated in 2025, but understanding the evolving risks around FDI considerations will be critical.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Foreign direct investments, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, are generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
In the US, most FDI deals are approved without mitigation, but the landscape is evolving based on a combination of expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, increased rates of mitigation, further attention to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions.
The European Commission continues to be a driver of FDI screening across the EU, with Member States now moving toward coordinated enforcement.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and extensive interpretation of the Austrian FDI regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning of the M&A process.
The Belgian FDI screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidelines that help parties navigate it.
In 2024, Bulgaria established an FDI screening mechanism. Foreign investors' obligation to file for investment clearance did not become effective in 2024, but this should change soon.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive, and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia's FDI screening mechanism closed its first effective year in 2024.
FDI deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French FDI screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's FDI review continued in full swing in 2024, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Hungarian FDI regulation stands as a rock amid global economic storms, although there were few major changes in 2024.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review more tan ten years old and continuously expanding its reach.
The law in Latvia provides for sectoral FDI regimes for specific corporate M&A, real estate dealings and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review in Lithuania.
The Luxembourg FDI screening regime is now a year old, and the first notification filings have been made.
Malta's FDI regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may potentially be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment regime is in the process of being expanded, with more profound changes expected in the future.
After revision of the Polish FDI regime in 2024, the way the authorities are assessing transactions is evolving.
In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared to other EU countries, the Romanian FDI regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2024 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course taken earlier in 2023.
After two years of foreign investment regulation in Slovakia, a supportive climate for foreign investments remains.
Slovenia's updated FDI regime now extends to branch offices and introduces new challenges for foreign investors navigating critical sectors.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments are subject to scrutiny in Spain and, since then, additional formalities have been introduced, specifically by a developing FDI regulation that entered into force on September 1, 2023. The FDI analysis is becoming increasingly crucial in the context of investments in Spain.
In its second year of operation, the Swedish FDI Act has become a standard component of a large portion of all transactions involving Swedish companies.
Apart from limited sector-specific regulations, there is currently no general FDI regime in Switzerland. An FDI Act is expected to come into force in 2026 at the earliest.
Strengthening Türkiye's position as a key investment hub remains a government priority.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
FDI in the UK is covered by the National Security and Investment Act 2021, and in 2024 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's FDI regimes underwent some modifications in 2024, designed to streamline the process of carrying out investments.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, opening up market access and lowering investment thresholds into listed companies.
FDI continues to be an area of focus for the Indian government, which has announced plans to attract further foreign investment into the country.
The Japanese government expands business sectors subject to Japan's FDI regime to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea continues to welcome foreign investment, offering enhanced incentive packages and easing regulations while heightening scrutiny over transactions involving strategic industrial.
New Zealand has recently seen a period of stabilization of the overseas investment regime. However, following the formation of the coalition government at the end of 2023, this government has proposed significant changes to the overseas investment rules for 2025, making it easier for overseas investors to acquire New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote FDI under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign and PRC investors.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive, and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Explore Trendscape Our take on the interconnected global trends that are shaping the business climate for our clients.
Jesper Fabricius and Rikke Sonne (Accura Law Firm) authored this publication
The Danish Investment Screening Act (DISA) applies to foreign direct investments and "special financial agreements". The DISA also applies to certain contracts relating to the Danish energy island in the North Sea. The DISA is administered by the Danish Business Authority (DBA).
Foreign direct investments and certain special financial agreements are investments or agreements that are made or entered into by foreign investors or service providers, including: non-Danish citizens; companies not domiciled in Denmark, even if the company has a permanent establishment in Denmark; companies domiciled in Denmark if the company is a subsidiary of a company not domiciled in Denmark; or companies domiciled in Denmark if a non-Danish citizen or a company not domiciled in Denmark has control over or significant influence on it.
The filing obligation concerning contracts relating to the energy island in the North Sea applies to all tenderers and contracting (and subcontracting) parties.
The filing obligation rests with the foreign investor, and filings must be made digitally to the DBA using the DBA's designated application forms.
The filing must include detailed information on the investment or agreement, the foreign investor and the Danish target company, including ownership structure charts of the foreign investor and of the Danish target company before and after the investment or agreement.
The submission of an EU notification form may be required for investments going into phase 2.
The filing obligation only relates to foreign direct investments in and special financial agreements with Danish entities operating within "particularly sensitive sectors or activities". These include: the defense sector; IT security functions or processing of classified information; production of dual-use items; critical technology; and critical infrastructure.
Filing to the DBA is mandatory if the foreign investor directly or indirectly acquires at least 10 percent of the shares or equivalent control by other means. The obligation applies to all foreign investors, even in the EU and EFTA.
For special financial agreements, a filing obligation only applies to foreign investors domiciled outside the EU or EFTA, or where at least 25 percent of the shares or equivalent control by other means are held by non-EU/EFTA entities or citizens, meaning the entity is under significant influence from non-EU/EFTA parties.
The DBA may intervene even in investments in or special financial agreements with entities outside the particularly sensitive sectors or activities if the investment or agreement nevertheless poses a threat to national security or public order. This only applies if the foreign investor is domiciled outside the EU/EFTA or under significant influence from non-EU/EFTA entities or citizens. The risk of intervention may be avoided by a voluntary filing to, and approval from, the DBA.
Contracts relating to the Danish energy island in the North Sea are also subject to a filing obligation.
When assessing whether a foreign direct investment or a special financial agreement may constitute a threat to national security or public order, the DBA will take all relevant circumstances and available information into account.
It considers whether the Danish target operates within or influences the critical infrastructure sector; whether the target processes or has access to classified information or sensitive personal data; the target's position on the Danish market, including opportunities for substitution; whether the Danish target belongs to the defense industry, produces dual-use items or other critical technology of importance to national security or public order; and whether the Danish target deals with supply of critical raw materials, including energy and food safety.
When it comes to the foreign investor, the DBA considers whether the investor is directly or indirectly controlled by a foreign government, including foreign government agencies or armed forces of a third country, including through ownership or substantial financing. It also considers whether the foreign investor is, or has been, involved in activities affecting security or public order in an EU Member State or in other friendly and allied countries; or whether there is a serious risk that it will engage in or is involved in illegal or criminal activities significant to national security or public order; and whether there are indications that the foreign investor is deliberately trying to circumvent the screening rules, for example, through the use of front companies.
The DBA will consult other relevant Danish authorities, EU Member States and the EU Commission when making the assessment.
The review process timeline for Danish FDI filings is divided into two phases. Phase 1 begins once the DBA declares the foreign investor's application for approval to be complete, and it must be concluded within 45 calendar days. A phase 1 screening may result in approval or the opening of phase 2 proceedings.
If the DBA cannot approve the transaction within the prescribed deadline for phase 1 but sees a need for further investigation or information, it will initiate phase 2 proceedings. Phase 2 will not start until the DBA has declared that all the requested information has been submitted, and must be concluded within 125 calendar days from when the in-depth investigation was initiated.
A phase 2 screening may result in approval; a decision to negotiate terms with the foreign investor; or the application being submitted to the Minister for Industry, Business and Financial Affairs for a final decision. There is no formal deadline for the Minister's review.
The scope of the DISA is very broad. In particular, the assessment of whether a Danish target may be considered to operate within the particularly sensitive sectors and activities requires a careful assessment of the target's business activities.
A pre-screening option is available, allowing a foreign investor to get a fast-track assessment from the DBA as to whether a Danish entity operates within the sensitive sectors of critical technology or critical infrastructure. Pre-screening applications must be submitted digitally to the DBA, and a response from the DBA may generally be expected within one to two weeks. Pre-screening can only determine whether a Danish entity falls within the sensitive sectors of critical technology or critical infrastructure, not whether it falls into any of the other sensitive sectors and activities. The DBA tends to request a full filing if it cannot easily determine that the Danish entity is not operating in critical technology or critical infrastructure.
The DISA also applies to a foreign investor's investment in targets outside Denmark if the target has a Danish subsidiary operating within the particularly sensitive sectors and activities.
The DBA has a duty to offer reasonable guidance to citizens and businesses. Although the scope of this duty is relatively opaque, the DBA is generally quite forthcoming in rendering informal guidance on the application of the DISA. If circumstances are sensitive, however, very little upfront guidance may be expected.
There are no fines for not complying with the DISA. With regard to a foreign investment in shares, the main sanction is that the Danish authorities may request the foreign investor to dispose of its investment or, in the alternative, repeal any voting rights on the shares. Depending on the circumstances, this could potentially end up in the Danish target being dissolved. Regarding special financial agreements, these may eventually become null and void.
The DBA initiated a public hearing of the DISA in March 2024 with the purpose of including experiences from the practical application of the DISA in the DBA's evaluation hereof. The hearing material included overall themes of special interest to the DBA, such as the DISA's exceptions for internal company restructurings, special rules for listed companies, greenfield investments, the delimitation of critical infrastructure and critical technologies, the relationship between the public procurement rules and FDI screening, experiences with the DBA's two-phased case handling process, and more. It is yet uncertain if and when the hearing will lead to further amendments to the DISA.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2025 White & Case LLP