Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Now a full decade in publication, White & Case's 2025 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continues to provide a comprehensive look at foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations across various countries and regions worldwide.
In this edition, we continue to offer key datapoints that can help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the new set of challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions that span multiple countries.
FDI screening is continuously evolving, in fact, maturing. It is imperative to stay on top of the FDI requirements as transactions—be it mergers and acquisitions, investments, public equity offerings, or financial restructurings—are negotiated. Understanding the challenges, the potential remedies that could be required for approval and the proper allocation of FDI risk are key ingredients in avoiding unpleasant surprises related to timing, certainty and business plan execution.
With a new administration in the United States, a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, increased EU FDI cooperation, and the new geo-political lines and balances that are being drawn, the dynamics around FDI screening will be a driving consideration in the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully consummated in 2025, but understanding the evolving risks around FDI considerations will be critical.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Foreign direct investments, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, are generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
In the US, most FDI deals are approved without mitigation, but the landscape is evolving based on a combination of expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, increased rates of mitigation, further attention to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions.
The European Commission continues to be a driver of FDI screening across the EU, with Member States now moving toward coordinated enforcement.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and extensive interpretation of the Austrian FDI regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning of the M&A process.
The Belgian FDI screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidelines that help parties navigate it.
In 2024, Bulgaria established an FDI screening mechanism. Foreign investors' obligation to file for investment clearance did not become effective in 2024, but this should change soon.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive, and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia's FDI screening mechanism closed its first effective year in 2024.
FDI deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French FDI screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's FDI review continued in full swing in 2024, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Hungarian FDI regulation stands as a rock amid global economic storms, although there were few major changes in 2024.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review more tan ten years old and continuously expanding its reach.
The law in Latvia provides for sectoral FDI regimes for specific corporate M&A, real estate dealings and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review in Lithuania.
The Luxembourg FDI screening regime is now a year old, and the first notification filings have been made.
Malta's FDI regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may potentially be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment regime is in the process of being expanded, with more profound changes expected in the future.
After revision of the Polish FDI regime in 2024, the way the authorities are assessing transactions is evolving.
In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared to other EU countries, the Romanian FDI regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2024 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course taken earlier in 2023.
After two years of foreign investment regulation in Slovakia, a supportive climate for foreign investments remains.
Slovenia's updated FDI regime now extends to branch offices and introduces new challenges for foreign investors navigating critical sectors.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments are subject to scrutiny in Spain and, since then, additional formalities have been introduced, specifically by a developing FDI regulation that entered into force on September 1, 2023. The FDI analysis is becoming increasingly crucial in the context of investments in Spain.
In its second year of operation, the Swedish FDI Act has become a standard component of a large portion of all transactions involving Swedish companies.
Apart from limited sector-specific regulations, there is currently no general FDI regime in Switzerland. An FDI Act is expected to come into force in 2026 at the earliest.
Strengthening Türkiye's position as a key investment hub remains a government priority.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
FDI in the UK is covered by the National Security and Investment Act 2021, and in 2024 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's FDI regimes underwent some modifications in 2024, designed to streamline the process of carrying out investments.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, opening up market access and lowering investment thresholds into listed companies.
FDI continues to be an area of focus for the Indian government, which has announced plans to attract further foreign investment into the country.
The Japanese government expands business sectors subject to Japan's FDI regime to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea continues to welcome foreign investment, offering enhanced incentive packages and easing regulations while heightening scrutiny over transactions involving strategic industrial.
New Zealand has recently seen a period of stabilization of the overseas investment regime. However, following the formation of the coalition government at the end of 2023, this government has proposed significant changes to the overseas investment rules for 2025, making it easier for overseas investors to acquire New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote FDI under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign and PRC investors.
After two years of foreign investment regulation in Slovakia, a supportive climate for foreign investments remains.
Explore Trendscape Our take on the interconnected global trends that are shaping the business climate for our clients.
David Kunák (White & Case) contributed to the development of this publication
In Slovakia, foreign investments are regulated by Act No. 497/2022 Coll., on the Screening of Foreign Investments, as amended (the FDI Act), which provides for complex regulation of foreign investment screening in Slovakia.
As outlined in the explanatory memorandum to the FDI Act, its main objective is to provide safeguards, and ensure the preservation of domestic and EU security and public order, while encouraging responsible foreign investments with no intention of restricting foreign investment in Slovakia.
The Slovak Ministry of Economy issues an annual summary report on the application of the FDI Act in June each year, covering detailed statistics for the preceding calendar year. Although the summary report for 2024 has not yet been published, there are no indications that would suggest any substantial changes compared to the 2023 statistics.
Under the FDI Act, foreign investors including legal entities having their registered seat outside of the EU, and individuals who are not citizens of the EU, are responsible for applying for screening to the ministry.
Furthermore, under the FDI Act, EU citizens, as well as legal entities with their registered seat within the EU, are considered a foreign investor, and so responsible for filing, if they are controlled by or receive fundings from a non-EU government, or if they are being controlled by an entity from a third non-EU country.
Foreign investors are responsible for submitting the application for screening to the ministry if their intended investment falls within the scope of the foreign investment as defined by the FDI Act.
Foreign investment includes any investment, regardless of the applicability of Slovak laws, as long as it directly or indirectly enables the foreign investor to: acquire a Slovak target or key assets of a Slovak target; acquire effective participation (voting rights or registered capital) in a Slovak target (10 percent in a critical foreign investment and 25 percent in a non-critical foreign investment); increase effective participation in a Slovak target (to 20 percent, 33 percent or 50 per- cent in case of critical foreign investment, and to 50 percent in case of non-critical foreign investment); or exercise control over a Slovak target.
The FDI Act distinguishes between critical foreign investments (CFIs) and non-critical foreign investments (NCFIs). Each is subject to a different screening regime.
CFIs include transactions where the target companies operate in specific, sensitive sectors, such as: firearms manufacturers; entities active in military technology or materials research, development or innovation; dual-use item manufacturers or entities active in the research, development or innovation of dual-use items; entities active in the biotechnology sector; critical infrastructure operators, designated as such by the Slovak government; digital service providers; and providers of content-sharing platforms with an annual turnover exceeding €2 million.
Completion of a CFI is subject to receiving approval or conditional approval from the ministry, which forces a pre-closing screening in case of a mandatory CFI.
Even though NCFIs are not subject to mandatory pre-closing screening, for the sake of clarification, foreign investors are encouraged to voluntarily request assessment by the ministry before completing their investment.
Although no such proceedings appear to have been initiated yet, the Slovak government reserves the right to initiate ex officio proceedings on any foreign investment within two years from completion if there is a reasonable belief that a foreign investment had a negative impact when it was completed.
The primary scope of the review is assessment of the potential negative impact of the foreign investment on the security and public order in Slovakia, or other EU Member States. Various other factors and aspects, including information concerning the Slovak target and the foreign investor, along with any entities controlling the foreign investor or those under the foreign investor's control, are also considered during the screening process.
During the FDI screening process, the ministry cooperates with other consulting authorities, such as other ministries, the National Intelligence Agency and the police force.
With respect to NCFIs, based on the request of the foreign investor, the ministry conducts an assessment of whether there is a risk of negative impact of the foreign investment. If no risk of negative impact has been identified, the ministry will issue a confirmation of that fact to the foreign investor and the Slovak target. However, if the ministry identifies a risk of negative impact, it can initiate a full-scope screening process of the NCFI as in the case of CFIs.
Failure to comply with obligations under the FDI Act may ultimately result in the ministry issuing a fine of up to the value of the foreign investment or up to 2 percent of the foreign investor's annual turnover, whichever is higher.
The mandatory screening process will only commence once the ministry considers the screening application filed by the foreign investor to be complete. This means that the time period for issuing a decision does not run while the foreign investor or the Slovak target is supplementing or correcting information, documents or explanation requested by the ministry.
If no decision is issued by the ministry or the Slovak government within 130 days of the commencement of the mandatory screening procedure, the ministry will be deemed to have approved the CFI.
Should the ministry decide to reject the CFI, the Slovak government may veto this decision, ultimately approving the CFI.
In case of an NCFI, the assessment procedure takes up to 45 days. If the ministry does not initiate the full-scope screening procedure within 45 days from receiving the assessment request, it shall be deemed that no risk of negative impact of the NCFI has been identified.
Considering that the average length of the screening proceedings is 60 days for NCFIs and 95 days for CFIs, foreign investors, particularly those investing in CFIs, should not underestimate the time aspect of the screening procedures. It should be expected that the ministry will most likely issue follow-up questions concerning the foreign investment.
Therefore, it is advisable for foreign investors to duly prepare for the process, monitor it closely and proactively communicate with the authorities to be able to better foresee and manage the entire screening process and its timing.
Additional useful information may be found at the ministry's website, where foreign investors have access to valuable and practical information about the FDI Act, screening procedure and the annual summary report on the application of the FDI Act, which are also published in English. Although the FDI Act does not explicitly provide for this option, the foreign investor may also informally consult with the ministry via an email to fdiscreening@mhsr.sk in order to obtain initial information about whether the contemplated foreign investment is subject to mandatory FDI screening.
The number of applications for screening assessment is expected to get higher as the business environment and economy in Slovakia and the EU improve. The ministry's constructive and pro-business approach is likely to remain.
While a planned amendment to the FDI Act is expected to align it with needs arising from practical experience, the timeline for its adoption remains uncertain. This amendment should also address the planned revision of the EU Screening Regulation.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2025 White & Case LLP