Our thinking

Foreign direct investment reviews 2025: A global perspective

What's inside

Understanding the ever-evolving global FDI landscape is crucial amid growing regulatory complexities in cross-border transactions and increased geopolitical tensions.

Introduction

Now a full decade in publication, White & Case's 2025 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continues to provide a comprehensive look at foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations across various countries and regions worldwide.

In this edition, we continue to offer key datapoints that can help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the new set of challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions that span multiple countries.

FDI screening is continuously evolving, in fact, maturing. It is imperative to stay on top of the FDI requirements as transactions—be it mergers and acquisitions, investments, public equity offerings, or financial restructurings—are negotiated. Understanding the challenges, the potential remedies that could be required for approval and the proper allocation of FDI risk are key ingredients in avoiding unpleasant surprises related to timing, certainty and business plan execution.

With a new administration in the United States, a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, increased EU FDI cooperation, and the new geo-political lines and balances that are being drawn, the dynamics around FDI screening will be a driving consideration in the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully consummated in 2025, but understanding the evolving risks around FDI considerations will be critical.

Americas

Canada

The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.

canada fdi 2022

Mexico

Foreign direct investments, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, are generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.

mexico fdi 2022

United States

In the US, most FDI deals are approved without mitigation, but the landscape is evolving based on a combination of expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, increased rates of mitigation, further attention to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions.

United States of America

EMEA

European Union

The European Commission continues to be a driver of FDI screening across the EU, with Member States now moving toward coordinated enforcement.

european union fdi 2022

Austria

The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and extensive interpretation of the Austrian FDI regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning of the M&A process.

austria fdi 2022

Belgium

The Belgian FDI screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidelines that help parties navigate it.

Belgium

Bulgaria

In 2024, Bulgaria established an FDI screening mechanism. Foreign investors' obligation to file for investment clearance did not become effective in 2024, but this should change soon.

Bulgaria

Czech Republic

The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.

czech republic fdi 2022

Denmark

The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive, and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.

Denmark

Estonia

Estonia's FDI screening mechanism closed its first effective year in 2024.

estonia fdi 2022

Finland

FDI deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.

10_finland_square_800x800_0.jpg

France

French FDI screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny.

france fdi 2022

Germany

Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's FDI review continued in full swing in 2024, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.

Germany

Hungary

Hungarian FDI regulation stands as a rock amid global economic storms, although there were few major changes in 2024.

hungary fdi 2022

Ireland

Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.

ireland fdi 2022

Italy

Italy's "Golden Power Law" review more tan ten years old and continuously expanding its reach.

Italy

Latvia

The law in Latvia provides for sectoral FDI regimes for specific corporate M&A, real estate dealings and gambling companies.

Latvia

Lithuania

All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review in Lithuania.

Lithuania

Luxembourg

The Luxembourg FDI screening regime is now a year old, and the first notification filings have been made.

Luxembourg

Malta

Malta's FDI regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may potentially be subject to screening.

Malta

Middle East

The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.

Middle East

Netherlands

The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.

Netherlands

Norway

Norway's foreign direct investment regime is in the process of being expanded, with more profound changes expected in the future.

Norway

Poland

After revision of the Polish FDI regime in 2024, the way the authorities are assessing transactions is evolving.

Poland

Portugal

In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.

Portugal

Romania

While far-reaching in its scope, compared to other EU countries, the Romanian FDI regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.

Romania

Russian Federation

The year 2024 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course taken earlier in 2023.

Russian Federation

Slovakia

After two years of foreign investment regulation in Slovakia, a supportive climate for foreign investments remains.

Slovakia

Slovenia

Slovenia's updated FDI regime now extends to branch offices and introduces new challenges for foreign investors navigating critical sectors.

Slovenia

Spain

Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments are subject to scrutiny in Spain and, since then, additional formalities have been introduced, specifically by a developing FDI regulation that entered into force on September 1, 2023. The FDI analysis is becoming increasingly crucial in the context of investments in Spain.

Spain

Sweden

In its second year of operation, the Swedish FDI Act has become a standard component of a large portion of all transactions involving Swedish companies.

Sweden

Switzerland

Apart from limited sector-specific regulations, there is currently no general FDI regime in Switzerland. An FDI Act is expected to come into force in 2026 at the earliest.

Switzerland

Türkiye

Strengthening Türkiye's position as a key investment hub remains a government priority.

Turkiye

United Arab Emirates

Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.

UAE

United Kingdom

FDI in the UK is covered by the National Security and Investment Act 2021, and in 2024 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.

UK

Asia-Pacific

Australia

Australia's FDI regimes underwent some modifications in 2024, designed to streamline the process of carrying out investments.

Australia

China

China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, opening up market access and lowering investment thresholds into listed companies.

China

India

FDI continues to be an area of focus for the Indian government, which has announced plans to attract further foreign investment into the country.

India

Japan

The Japanese government expands business sectors subject to Japan's FDI regime to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.

Japan

Republic of Korea

The Republic of Korea continues to welcome foreign investment, offering enhanced incentive packages and easing regulations while heightening scrutiny over transactions involving strategic industrial.

Korea

New Zealand

New Zealand has recently seen a period of stabilization of the overseas investment regime. However, following the formation of the coalition government at the end of 2023, this government has proposed significant changes to the overseas investment rules for 2025, making it easier for overseas investors to acquire New Zealand assets.

New Zealand

Taiwan

Taiwan continues to promote FDI under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign and PRC investors.

Taiwan
Hungary

Foreign direct investment reviews 2025: Hungary

Hungarian FDI regulation stands as a rock amid global economic storms, although there were few major changes in 2024.

Insight

9 min read

Explore Trendscape

Our take on the interconnected global trends that are shaping the business climate for our clients.

Iván Sólyom and Soma Schóber (Lakatos, Köves & Partners) authored this publication

The year 2024 was relatively silent regarding reforms to Hungary's FDI regimes. Hungary kept its former FDI regulation structure, and still has two separate FDI regimes in force. The regimes also kept their own territories: The first regime, the so-called "General FDI Regime" still focuses on a narrower scope and covers only sectors closely related to national security and public utility services, while the second, the "Special FDI Regime" covers a much wider part of the economy affecting numerous deals in general.

Although the Special and the General FDI Regimes are regulated in separate pieces of legislation, the subject matter (FDI screening) is similar, and both focus on the origin of the investor and the activities of Hungarian target companies.

Summary of major changes in 2024

  • The competent ministry under the Special FDI Regime has changed, and FDI notifications under this regime are reviewed and acknowledged by the Minister of National Economy.
  • Under the Special FDI Regime, the Hungarian state has been granted a new preemption right in transactions affecting companies active in power generation with solar power plants.

Who files?

In case of both regimes, the foreign investor makes the FDI notification to the competent minister. However, the definition of foreign investor under the two regimes differs.

Under the General FDI Regime, any natural person or legal entity qualifies as a foreign investor if it is: a citizen of, or registered in, a country outside of the EU, EEA or Switzerland; or a legal entity registered in the EU, EEA or Switzerland but controlled by a non-EU/EEA/Swiss person or entity.

According to the Special FDI Regime, foreign investors are: those natural or legal persons or organizations that are citizens of, or registered in, a country outside of the EU, EEA or Switzerland; or legal entities registered in the EU, EEA or Switzerland, if they are under the majority control of natural or legal persons or organizations that are citizens of, or registered in, a country that is outside of the EU, EEA or Switzerland.

The Special FDI Regime also applies to EU/EEA/Swiss investors—both natural and legal persons—if they acquire majority control and the investment exceeds HUF 350 million (US$888,000).

Types of deals reviewed

Under the General FDI Regime, a number of transaction types are covered.

The deal will be reviewed if a foreign investor establishes a new Hungarian company or acquires more than 25 percent ownership interest in an existing Hungarian privately held company, or more than 10 percent in publicly listed companies, or acquires a "dominant influence" in such a company.

The regime also applies when a foreign investor acquires equity of less than 25 percent in a privately held company registered in Hungary, but the total equity held by foreign investors exceeds 25 percent as a result.

Transactions will also be reviewed where a company registered in Hungary in which foreign investors hold equity equivalent to that set out above takes up a listed strategic activity.

Other covered transactions include where a foreign investor registers a branch office in Hungary for the purpose of carrying out listed strategic activities, or where a foreign investor acquires a right to operate or use infrastructure or assets that are indispensable for carrying out listed strategic activities.

The Special FDI Regime covers transactions involving the acquisition of ownership interest; capital increase; mergers, demergers or transformations to another company form; issuance of bonds that are convertible or convert to equity or provide preferential subscription rights; and establishing a "usufruct" right over equity, in other words, a right to enjoy the use of and benefits from equity, absent or in lieu of ownership.

The above applies provided that, as a result of the transaction, the foreign investor would acquire majority control—ownership, voting rights, appointing management or otherwise—if the investment reaches or exceeds HUF 350 million; or in the case of non-EU/non-EEA investors, at least 5 percent ownership interest (or 3 percent ownership interest in publicly listed companies), if the investment reaches or exceeds HUF 350 million; or an ownership interest reaching 10 percent, 20 percent or 50 percent in a strategic company or any level of interest which, if computed together with any other foreign investors' interest, exceeds 25 percent.

In addition, irrespective of ownership thresholds or transaction sizes, the transfer of using or operational rights of infrastructures and assets that are "indispensable for the operation of strategic companies," including the pledging of these assets and infrastructures, require both notification to, and acknowledgement by, the competent minister.

In relation to transactions caught by the Special FDI Regime, it is important to mention that indirect acquisitions and higher-level intragroup restructurings fall outside its scope.

Scope of the review

Under the General FDI Regime, the competent minister reviews whether the triggering event "harms Hungary's security interests," which is not defined in the relevant laws and thus gives a broad framework for discretion to the competent minister.

In case of an EU entity controlled by a non-EU investor, a blocking decision can only be made in the case of circumvention, for example, if it can be established that the EU entity's involvement in the transaction is for the purpose of circumventing the FDI screening rules. This could be the case, in particular, if the EU entity controlled by a non-EU investor does not carry out any actual economic activities or has no real presence in EU Member States.

Under the Special FDI Regime, the competent minister evaluates whether the proposed transaction endangers or threatens to endanger the national interest, public order or public security of Hungary, with particular attention to the security of supply relating to the basic needs of society, in accordance with the relevant articles of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, which invoke, among others, public policy, public security or public health issues.

The minister also evaluates whether the foreign investor is directly or indirectly under the control of any administrative agency of any non-EU state (including its ownership structure or financing); whether the foreign investor is or was involved in any activity relating to public security or public order in any other member state; and whether there is substantial risk that the applicant will commit any crime or illegal activity.

It is worth highlighting that under the Special FDI Regime, a new preemption right has been introduced for the Hungarian state relating to transactions affecting companies active in power generation with solar power plants. The relevant rules for these cases say that if the target of a potential transaction is a Hungarian company active in power generation with solar power plants, then the FDI notification shall include an additional notification to the Minister of National Economy noting that the preemption rights of the Hungarian state may apply to the transaction.

If the minister also concludes that the transaction is subject to the preemption right of the state, then the Ministry of National Economy informs the minister responsible for energy policy about the transaction, who can decide on exercising the preemption right within 15 business days from receiving the information. If the minister responsible for energy policy decides to exercise the preemption right, then the original transaction shall be concluded by and between the seller and the Hungarian state, and the Minister of National Economy will not decide on the FDI notification.

If the Hungarian state does not exercise its preemption right, then the Minister of National Economy will decide on the acknowledgement of the FDI notification in accordance with the general rules.

Review process timeline

Under the General FDI Regime, the foreign investor must make a notification to the minister leading the prime minister's Cabinet Office before implementation and within 10 days of both signing the contract, in the event of equity acquisitions and operation right acquisitions; and the registration of the newly subscribed strategic activity in the company registry, for strategic activities.

The deadline for review by the minister is 60 days (extendable by 60 days) from the date of filing.

According to the Special FDI Regime, the foreign investor must make a notification to the Minister of National Economy within 10 days from signing the transaction documents. The minister has 30 business days to decide on the transaction, and the deadline can be extended by 15 business days.

In case of target companies active in power generation with solar power plants, the Hungarian state can exercise its preemption right within 60 business days, and the Minister of National Economy also has 60 business days (extendable by 15 calendar days) to decide on the notification. The deadlines are counted from the ministry's notification to the notifying party of the existence of the preemption right of the Hungarian state.

The relevant ministries do not always comply with the deadlines set out in relevant laws, therefore substantial delays may occur in certain cases, and there are no effective remedies against such delays.

How foreign investors can protect themselves

Conducting an FDI analysis at the initial stages of the intended transaction is critical if the contemplated transaction touches on Hungarian companies or assets. In certain cases where FDI screening may be needed based on the applicable legal provisions, an informal discussion with the competent ministry or a written request to express their views on the transaction on a no-name basis can be useful. However, it should be highlighted that the ministries are not keen to provide such opinions and those opinions would be on a non-reliance basis.

If the initial FDI analysis shows that an FDI notification is necessary under the General FDI Regime, then the FDI notification is mandatory. However, if the initial FDI analysis indicates that an FDI notification is necessary under the Special FDI Regime, there are some exceptions to explore (and maybe use) before making such a notification.

These include potential structuring of the transaction to avoid the effects of the Special FDI Regime by making the transaction indirect from the Hungarian company's perspective. Alternatively, consider if an adjustment can be made to the registered activities of the target company so as to avoid unnecessary strategic activities. Hungarian targets may sometimes register a broad list of activities, even though the actual activities of the target are narrower and do not include strategic activities.

If a filing is necessary, then the process can be expedited if the filings are well prepared, address potential questions, and appropriate communications and advocacy efforts with relevant authorities are undertaken during the process.

Looking ahead: Likely developments in the next year

As the General FDI Regime is based on EU legislation, no changes are expected to it unless the underlying EU legislation changes, which is not anticipated in the near term.

Regarding the Special FDI Regime, it is worth highlighting that this piece of legislation is in force with regard to the state of emergency effective since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, and which remains in force due to the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. If such extraordinary circumstances end, then it is possible that major changes could happen to the Special FDI regulation, but it is also conceivable that the legislator would keep it in force without major amendments even if the extraordinary circumstances cease to exist.

White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.

This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.

© 2025 White & Case LLP

Top