Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Now a full decade in publication, White & Case's 2025 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continues to provide a comprehensive look at foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations across various countries and regions worldwide.
In this edition, we continue to offer key datapoints that can help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the new set of challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions that span multiple countries.
FDI screening is continuously evolving, in fact, maturing. It is imperative to stay on top of the FDI requirements as transactions—be it mergers and acquisitions, investments, public equity offerings, or financial restructurings—are negotiated. Understanding the challenges, the potential remedies that could be required for approval and the proper allocation of FDI risk are key ingredients in avoiding unpleasant surprises related to timing, certainty and business plan execution.
With a new administration in the United States, a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, increased EU FDI cooperation, and the new geo-political lines and balances that are being drawn, the dynamics around FDI screening will be a driving consideration in the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully consummated in 2025, but understanding the evolving risks around FDI considerations will be critical.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Foreign direct investments, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, are generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
In the US, most FDI deals are approved without mitigation, but the landscape is evolving based on a combination of expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, increased rates of mitigation, further attention to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions.
The European Commission continues to be a driver of FDI screening across the EU, with Member States now moving toward coordinated enforcement.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and extensive interpretation of the Austrian FDI regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning of the M&A process.
The Belgian FDI screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidelines that help parties navigate it.
In 2024, Bulgaria established an FDI screening mechanism. Foreign investors' obligation to file for investment clearance did not become effective in 2024, but this should change soon.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive, and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia's FDI screening mechanism closed its first effective year in 2024.
FDI deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French FDI screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's FDI review continued in full swing in 2024, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Hungarian FDI regulation stands as a rock amid global economic storms, although there were few major changes in 2024.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review more tan ten years old and continuously expanding its reach.
The law in Latvia provides for sectoral FDI regimes for specific corporate M&A, real estate dealings and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review in Lithuania.
The Luxembourg FDI screening regime is now a year old, and the first notification filings have been made.
Malta's FDI regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may potentially be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment regime is in the process of being expanded, with more profound changes expected in the future.
After revision of the Polish FDI regime in 2024, the way the authorities are assessing transactions is evolving.
In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared to other EU countries, the Romanian FDI regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2024 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course taken earlier in 2023.
After two years of foreign investment regulation in Slovakia, a supportive climate for foreign investments remains.
Slovenia's updated FDI regime now extends to branch offices and introduces new challenges for foreign investors navigating critical sectors.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments are subject to scrutiny in Spain and, since then, additional formalities have been introduced, specifically by a developing FDI regulation that entered into force on September 1, 2023. The FDI analysis is becoming increasingly crucial in the context of investments in Spain.
In its second year of operation, the Swedish FDI Act has become a standard component of a large portion of all transactions involving Swedish companies.
Apart from limited sector-specific regulations, there is currently no general FDI regime in Switzerland. An FDI Act is expected to come into force in 2026 at the earliest.
Strengthening Türkiye's position as a key investment hub remains a government priority.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
FDI in the UK is covered by the National Security and Investment Act 2021, and in 2024 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's FDI regimes underwent some modifications in 2024, designed to streamline the process of carrying out investments.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, opening up market access and lowering investment thresholds into listed companies.
FDI continues to be an area of focus for the Indian government, which has announced plans to attract further foreign investment into the country.
The Japanese government expands business sectors subject to Japan's FDI regime to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea continues to welcome foreign investment, offering enhanced incentive packages and easing regulations while heightening scrutiny over transactions involving strategic industrial.
New Zealand has recently seen a period of stabilization of the overseas investment regime. However, following the formation of the coalition government at the end of 2023, this government has proposed significant changes to the overseas investment rules for 2025, making it easier for overseas investors to acquire New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote FDI under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign and PRC investors.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review in Lithuania.
Explore Trendscape Our take on the interconnected global trends that are shaping the business climate for our clients.
Robertas Čiočys and Aušra Abraitytė-Gedminė (Ellex Legal) authored this publication
Under the Law on the Protection of Objects of Importance to Ensuring National Security of the Republic of Lithuania, only specific FDIs into entities, infrastructure or sectors deemed of importance to national security are subject to the FDI screening process.
The supervision of FDI review is assigned to the Commission for the Coordination of Protection of Objects of Importance to Ensuring National Security formed by the Government of Lithuania.
A natural person or legal entity seeking to invest in an entity, infrastructure or sector deemed of importance to national security must disclose and obtain the clearance to proceed with the investment. FDI regulation applies equally to both foreign and national investors if their investment falls under the scope of review.
However, a distinction is made depending on whether the investor is from an EU, NATO, EFTA or OECD country, or other countries.
For investors from EU, NATO, EFTA or OECD countries, the screening process is typically less burdensome, as they are presumed to align with national security interests. In contrast, investors from other countries undergo a more rigorous screening process, and certain types of FDI from these countries may be prohibited by the law.
In Lithuania, the FDI screening procedure applies to several sectors regarded as pillars of national security.
Screening is required for investment into specific companies explicitly recognized as strategically important to Lithuania’s national security due to their intended purpose or the nature of their activities. Such companies are listed in the law and fall into one of three categories: enterprises solely controlled by the state; enterprises with at least two-thirds of shares owned by the state; and entities that are not owned by the state.
Additionally, investments into assets or areas critical to national security, such as airports, railways, secured national data transmission networks, LNG terminals, and others, require screening. Land and territory of national importance are also included in the review.
Screening applies to five economic sectors critical to national security: energy; transport; information technology (including telecoms and high-tech); finance and credit; and military equipment. The government identifies specific activities within these sectors. In total, 54 activities are listed, requiring individual assessment on a case-by-case basis.
The objective of the review is to ensure the investor complies with and does not negatively impact Lithuania’s national security interests.
The Commission evaluates the investor’s identity and ownership structure, including ultimate owners—natural persons or legal entities. The source of funds for the investment is also scrutinized. The scope of the review and the required information depend on the nature of the investment, with stricter reviews for enterprises deemed important to national security and lighter reviews for economic sectors.
Findings about the investor are gathered from the State Security Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Interior, the Police Department and the General Prosecutor’s Office. Other institutions may also be involved at the Commission’s discretion.
The review process takes approximately ten to 40 working days from the day the Commission receives the FDI notice and required information.
In certain cases, the review process involves an initial stage during which it is established if screening should be carried out. This stage takes approximately ten working days.
If during this initial stage the institutions counter with information suggesting that screening must be carried out, the investor must provide the requested information and documents within ten business days of receipt of the request. Upon provision of this information and documents, the screening procedures will be initiated. If institutions do not counter with the required information, screening procedures should not be initiated. Usually, written confirmation that screening procedures will not be carried out is issued.
Upon the start of screening procedures, institutions must provide their findings within 15 working days, extendable by up to five additional working days. If no findings are provided, the investor is presumed not to conflict with national security.
The Commission has 20 working days from the start of the screening process, extendable by up to three additional working days, to conclude whether the investment aligns with national security interests. In case of a negative conclusion, the government must adopt a final decision within 15 working days from the adoption of the negative commission conclusion. If no decision is made, the investor is presumed to align with national security interests.
Investors should carefully assess whether their intended FDI falls under the screening requirements, particularly when investing in one of the five economic sectors critical to national security. When in doubt, it is prudent to initiate the FDI screening process.
FDI filing and screening should be completed before the closing of the transaction, usually a condition precedent in transaction documents. If post-investment screening is initiated and the investor fails to meet national security requirements, the Commission has the authority to declare the transaction null and void.
In case of the acquisition of shares or voting rights in an enterprise important for ensuring national security in violation of the law, the investor shall not have the right to participate and vote in the general meeting of shareholders nor exercise other non-property rights. It is noted that a change of ultimate owners and similar changes may also trigger screening procedures.
Proactively engaging with relevant Lithuanian authorities early in the investment planning phase is important to clarify any uncertainties regarding the applicability of FDI screening requirements. Foreign investors should also perform a comprehensive due diligence review of the targeted entity or assets. This should include an evaluation of their inclusion in national security-related activities, as well as an understanding of their role within the economic sectors critical to national security.
No further developments are anticipated in Lithuania’s FDI legislation for the coming year.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2025 White & Case LLP