Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Now a full decade in publication, White & Case's 2025 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continues to provide a comprehensive look at foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations across various countries and regions worldwide.
In this edition, we continue to offer key datapoints that can help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the new set of challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions that span multiple countries.
FDI screening is continuously evolving, in fact, maturing. It is imperative to stay on top of the FDI requirements as transactions—be it mergers and acquisitions, investments, public equity offerings, or financial restructurings—are negotiated. Understanding the challenges, the potential remedies that could be required for approval and the proper allocation of FDI risk are key ingredients in avoiding unpleasant surprises related to timing, certainty and business plan execution.
With a new administration in the United States, a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, increased EU FDI cooperation, and the new geo-political lines and balances that are being drawn, the dynamics around FDI screening will be a driving consideration in the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully consummated in 2025, but understanding the evolving risks around FDI considerations will be critical.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Foreign direct investments, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, are generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
In the US, most FDI deals are approved without mitigation, but the landscape is evolving based on a combination of expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, increased rates of mitigation, further attention to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions.
The European Commission continues to be a driver of FDI screening across the EU, with Member States now moving toward coordinated enforcement.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and extensive interpretation of the Austrian FDI regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning of the M&A process.
The Belgian FDI screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidelines that help parties navigate it.
In 2024, Bulgaria established an FDI screening mechanism. Foreign investors' obligation to file for investment clearance did not become effective in 2024, but this should change soon.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive, and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia's FDI screening mechanism closed its first effective year in 2024.
FDI deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French FDI screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's FDI review continued in full swing in 2024, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Hungarian FDI regulation stands as a rock amid global economic storms, although there were few major changes in 2024.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review more tan ten years old and continuously expanding its reach.
The law in Latvia provides for sectoral FDI regimes for specific corporate M&A, real estate dealings and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review in Lithuania.
The Luxembourg FDI screening regime is now a year old, and the first notification filings have been made.
Malta's FDI regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may potentially be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment regime is in the process of being expanded, with more profound changes expected in the future.
After revision of the Polish FDI regime in 2024, the way the authorities are assessing transactions is evolving.
In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared to other EU countries, the Romanian FDI regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2024 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course taken earlier in 2023.
After two years of foreign investment regulation in Slovakia, a supportive climate for foreign investments remains.
Slovenia's updated FDI regime now extends to branch offices and introduces new challenges for foreign investors navigating critical sectors.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments are subject to scrutiny in Spain and, since then, additional formalities have been introduced, specifically by a developing FDI regulation that entered into force on September 1, 2023. The FDI analysis is becoming increasingly crucial in the context of investments in Spain.
In its second year of operation, the Swedish FDI Act has become a standard component of a large portion of all transactions involving Swedish companies.
Apart from limited sector-specific regulations, there is currently no general FDI regime in Switzerland. An FDI Act is expected to come into force in 2026 at the earliest.
Strengthening Türkiye's position as a key investment hub remains a government priority.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
FDI in the UK is covered by the National Security and Investment Act 2021, and in 2024 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's FDI regimes underwent some modifications in 2024, designed to streamline the process of carrying out investments.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, opening up market access and lowering investment thresholds into listed companies.
FDI continues to be an area of focus for the Indian government, which has announced plans to attract further foreign investment into the country.
The Japanese government expands business sectors subject to Japan's FDI regime to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea continues to welcome foreign investment, offering enhanced incentive packages and easing regulations while heightening scrutiny over transactions involving strategic industrial.
New Zealand has recently seen a period of stabilization of the overseas investment regime. However, following the formation of the coalition government at the end of 2023, this government has proposed significant changes to the overseas investment rules for 2025, making it easier for overseas investors to acquire New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote FDI under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign and PRC investors.
Malta's FDI regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may potentially be subject to screening.
Explore Trendscape Our take on the interconnected global trends that are shaping the business climate for our clients.
Luca Amato of Fenech & Fenech Advocates authored this publication
Malta's FDI regime regulates certain FDIs made or planned to be made in Malta. The regime covers greenfield investments and acquisitions of companies operating in certain key areas, which would result in non-EU investors having direct or indirect ownership, or a controlling interest of more than 10 per- cent, in such companies.
The NFDISO Act obliges foreign investors and all persons involved in relevant FDIs to notify the NFDISO regarding the investment and to provide certain information regarding the entity carrying out the investment.
"Foreign investor" is defined as a natural person or an undertaking of a third (non-EU) country intending to make or having made an FDI in Malta.
The information to be provided includes the ownership structure and ultimate beneficial ownership of the investor, the value of the investment, the products, services and business operations of the foreign investor, and the source of funds for the investment. Additionally, the NFDISO may request any other information as it may reasonably require to ascertain whether a transaction ought to be screened.
The notification is made via NFDISO's online portal and must be signed by a company director of the foreign investor and, where applicable, the relevant advisory firm or agent assisting with the notification. Contact details of the director of the target must also be provided.
The Act covers certain FDIs made or planned to be made in Malta. An FDI is defined as an investment of any kind by a foreign investor aiming to establish or maintain lasting and direct links to carry on an economic activity in Malta, including investments that enable effective participation in the management or control of a company based in Malta.
Mandatory notification of FDIs is required by a foreign investor where an investment that affects any of the factors or activities mentioned in the schedule of the Act is planned to be carried out in the future. It is also required where, having carried out an investment in Malta, the business activity of a foreign investor is changing to one that affects any of the factors or activities mentioned in the schedule of the Act.
Notification is also required where, having carried out an investment in Malta that affects any of the factors or activities mentioned in the schedule, the ownership structure of an investor changes such that at least 10 percent becomes owned or controlled by foreign investors; and where, having carried out an investment, the direct or indirect controlling interest of a company or a group changes and passes onto a foreign investor.
The factors and activities mentioned in the Act that trigger a notification requirement are a direct transposition of the factors and activities contained in article 4 of the EU Regulation on FDI Screening (2019/452).
The first category is critical infrastructure, whether physical or virtual, including energy, transport, water, health, communications, media, data processing or storage, aerospace, defense, electoral or financial infrastructure, and sensitive facilities, as well as land and real estate crucial for the use of such infrastructure.
The second category is critical technologies and dual-use items as defined in point 1 of article 2 of the European Council Regulation (EC) No. 428/2009 (15), including artificial intelligence, robotics, semiconductors, cybersecurity, aerospace, defense, energy storage, quantum and nuclear technologies, as well as nanotechnologies and biotechnologies.
Notification is also required for activities relating to the supply of critical inputs, including energy or raw materials, as well as food security; access to sensitive information, including personal data, or the ability to control such information; and the freedom and pluralism of the media.
The factors to be considered are: whether the foreign investor is directly or indirectly controlled by the government of a third country, including state bodies or armed forces, through ownership structure or significant funding; whether the foreign investor has already been involved in activities affecting security or public order in an EU Member State; or whether there is a serious risk that the foreign investor engages in illegal or criminal activities.
Where, after considering the above activities and factors, the NFDISO concludes that the FDI affects the security or public order of Malta, it may condition, prohibit or unwind such an investment, and it must inform the foreign investor in writing of its decision. The notification of the decision includes the NFDISO's reasoning and justification, and the investor is not entitled to claim any compensation or reimbursement.
If the NFDISO determines that an investment should be subjected to one or more conditions, it shall permit the foreign investor to take all necessary measures in order to satisfy the said conditions within a reasonable time period. Should the investor fail to satisfy these within the prescribed time period, the NFDISO shall prohibit or unwind the investment.
Similarly, if an investment is declared unwound, the NFDISO shall permit the foreign investor to reverse or modify the investment within a reasonable time period. Failure to do so within the prescribed time period would entitle the NFDISO to commence judicial proceedings before the Civil Court for the unwinding of the investment.
The NFDISO shall determine within five days whether the investment will be subject to screening. In reaching its decision, the NFDISO will consider whether the investment may affect the security or public order of Malta on the basis of the aforementioned activities and factors. In making its assessment, the NFDISO may request any necessary additional information from the foreign investor and may seek clarifications and explanations.
Where the NFDISO concludes that the FDI shall not be subject to screening, it shall inform the foreign investor within five business days from the date of its decision. If the NFDISO concludes that the FDI should be subject to screening, it should inform the foreign investor within five business days from the date of its decision, and trigger the cooperation mechanism under the EU FDI Screening Regulation. Within 60 calendar days, the NFDISO must also determine whether the FDI could affect the security or public order of Malta.
The NFDISO is also empowered by law to impose administrative penalties ranging from not less than €1,000 for failure to provide information, to not more than €100,000 for providing incorrect, inaccurate or incomplete information.
Appeals to any decision of the NFDISO or the imposition of administrative penalties are allowed by bringing an action before the Administrative Review Tribunal.
Due to the broad wording of the law, the Act covers a substantial number of transactions, particularly in the context of the notification requirement. The activities mentioned in the legislation are drafted in a broad manner, particularly under limb, which covers sectors ranging from energy and health, to more commonplace industries such as media, communications and data processing or storage.
Prudent foreign investors would do well to take a cautious approach and notify the NFDISO whenever an investment is planned in a Maltese business that operates in the relevant sectors. Maltese law does not outline a specific point when the investment needs to be notified. In practice, it makes sense to notify the NFDISO whenever an investment is reliably deemed to occur, such as the period immediately following the signature of a share purchase agreement. Indeed, it is nowadays commonplace to include the obtaining of regulatory consent by the NFDISO as a condition precedent to completion in such agreements.
It is unlikely that major developments in local FDI legislation will occur over the coming year, and it ought to be mentioned that the number of investments that are actually subjected to screening have been low, particularly because what the NFDISO considers is whether the investment is occurring in a company that impacts the security of, or public order in, Malta.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2025 White & Case LLP