Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Now a full decade in publication, White & Case's 2025 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continues to provide a comprehensive look at foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations across various countries and regions worldwide.
In this edition, we continue to offer key datapoints that can help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the new set of challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions that span multiple countries.
FDI screening is continuously evolving, in fact, maturing. It is imperative to stay on top of the FDI requirements as transactions—be it mergers and acquisitions, investments, public equity offerings, or financial restructurings—are negotiated. Understanding the challenges, the potential remedies that could be required for approval and the proper allocation of FDI risk are key ingredients in avoiding unpleasant surprises related to timing, certainty and business plan execution.
With a new administration in the United States, a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, increased EU FDI cooperation, and the new geo-political lines and balances that are being drawn, the dynamics around FDI screening will be a driving consideration in the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully consummated in 2025, but understanding the evolving risks around FDI considerations will be critical.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Foreign direct investments, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, are generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
In the US, most FDI deals are approved without mitigation, but the landscape is evolving based on a combination of expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, increased rates of mitigation, further attention to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions.
The European Commission continues to be a driver of FDI screening across the EU, with Member States now moving toward coordinated enforcement.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and extensive interpretation of the Austrian FDI regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning of the M&A process.
The Belgian FDI screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidelines that help parties navigate it.
In 2024, Bulgaria established an FDI screening mechanism. Foreign investors' obligation to file for investment clearance did not become effective in 2024, but this should change soon.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive, and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia's FDI screening mechanism closed its first effective year in 2024.
FDI deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French FDI screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's FDI review continued in full swing in 2024, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Hungarian FDI regulation stands as a rock amid global economic storms, although there were few major changes in 2024.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review more tan ten years old and continuously expanding its reach.
The law in Latvia provides for sectoral FDI regimes for specific corporate M&A, real estate dealings and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review in Lithuania.
The Luxembourg FDI screening regime is now a year old, and the first notification filings have been made.
Malta's FDI regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may potentially be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment regime is in the process of being expanded, with more profound changes expected in the future.
After revision of the Polish FDI regime in 2024, the way the authorities are assessing transactions is evolving.
In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared to other EU countries, the Romanian FDI regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2024 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course taken earlier in 2023.
After two years of foreign investment regulation in Slovakia, a supportive climate for foreign investments remains.
Slovenia's updated FDI regime now extends to branch offices and introduces new challenges for foreign investors navigating critical sectors.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments are subject to scrutiny in Spain and, since then, additional formalities have been introduced, specifically by a developing FDI regulation that entered into force on September 1, 2023. The FDI analysis is becoming increasingly crucial in the context of investments in Spain.
In its second year of operation, the Swedish FDI Act has become a standard component of a large portion of all transactions involving Swedish companies.
Apart from limited sector-specific regulations, there is currently no general FDI regime in Switzerland. An FDI Act is expected to come into force in 2026 at the earliest.
Strengthening Türkiye's position as a key investment hub remains a government priority.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
FDI in the UK is covered by the National Security and Investment Act 2021, and in 2024 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's FDI regimes underwent some modifications in 2024, designed to streamline the process of carrying out investments.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, opening up market access and lowering investment thresholds into listed companies.
FDI continues to be an area of focus for the Indian government, which has announced plans to attract further foreign investment into the country.
The Japanese government expands business sectors subject to Japan's FDI regime to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea continues to welcome foreign investment, offering enhanced incentive packages and easing regulations while heightening scrutiny over transactions involving strategic industrial.
New Zealand has recently seen a period of stabilization of the overseas investment regime. However, following the formation of the coalition government at the end of 2023, this government has proposed significant changes to the overseas investment rules for 2025, making it easier for overseas investors to acquire New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote FDI under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign and PRC investors.
In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.
Explore Trendscape Our take on the interconnected global trends that are shaping the business climate for our clients.
João Marques Mendes and Joana Campelo (PLMJ) authored this publication.
In Portugal, the Council of Ministers has the power to oppose transactions involving the acquisition of direct or indirect control over strategic assets by non-EU or non-EEA natural or legal persons. Based on the imperative of ensuring public safety, the Council of Ministers reserves the right to object to transactions that pose a threat to national defense, security or critical services vital to the country's interests, in exceptional circumstances and via a duly justified decision.
Specifically, according to the Portuguese FDI Law, the Portuguese government may oppose investments made by foreign investors that allow direct or indirect control over strategic assets.
No changes to the FDI legal framework were introduced since 2014.
The Portuguese FDI Law does not require mandatory notification of any transaction. Nonetheless, the prospective purchaser may, on a voluntary basis, request advance confirmation that an opposition decision will not be issued. There is no official form for this request, but it must include the full description of the terms of the envisaged transaction. If the government does not initiate an assessment procedure within 30 business days counted from the date of the request, a non-opposition decision is deemed to have been issued.
If no confirmation is requested in advance, a review of the transaction can be initiated by the government ex officio within 30 business days from the conclusion of the transaction or from the date it becomes publicly known.
Under the Portuguese FDI Law, the Portuguese government has the power to review any transaction that allows control over strategic assets, which are defined as the key infrastructures and assets related to defense and national security, or to the provision of essential services in the energy, transport or communications sectors. There is no financial threshold for investments to be able to be screened under the law.
There is also no definition of "strategic assets related to defense and national security or to the provision of essential services in the energy, transport or communications sectors," which creates some uncertainty as to the possibility of screening of transactions in these sectors.
The review will focus on the nature of the business to be acquired and the parties involved in the transaction.
In the event a transaction is subject to FDI screening, the criteria that will guide whether the government opposes the transaction include, among other factors, the track record of the buyer and the country in which the buyer is domiciled or to which it is in some way linked. The law gives examples of some situations where it will assume a threat to the defense, national security or the security of supply of essential services.
The law defines situations where transactions resulting, directly or indirectly, in the acquisition of control, directly or indirectly, by a person or persons from countries outside the EU are likely to jeopardize national defense and security.
This includes where there are serious indications, based on objective elements, of the existence of links between the buyer and third countries that do not recognize or respect the fundamental principles of the democratic rule of law, which represent a risk to the international community as a result of the nature of their alliances; or who maintain relations with criminal or terrorist organizations or with persons linked to such organizations, taking into account the official positions of the EU in these matters.
National security may also be jeopardized where the buyer has, in the past, used the controlling position held over other assets to create serious difficulties for the regular provision of essential public services in the country in which they were located, as well as neighboring countries, or does not guarantee the main allocation of the assets, as well as their reversal at the end of the corresponding concessions, when they exist, namely taking into account the lack of adequate contractual provisions for this purpose.
Additionally, national security could be jeopardized if the transaction results in a change in the destination of strategic assets.
If an opposition decision is issued, all legal acts and transactions relating to the transaction in question shall be deemed null and void, including those relating to economic exploitation or the exercise of rights over the assets or over the entities that control them.
A review of the transaction can be initiated by the Portuguese government within 30 business days from the conclusion of the transaction or from the date it becomes publicly known, whichever occurs later, by means of notifying the prospective purchaser to present the information and relevant documents about the transaction within ten business days—if another deadline is not provided for in the notification.
The opposition decision must be taken by the Council of Ministers—upon a proposal from the member of the government responsible for the area in which the strategic asset in question is integrated—within 60 business days from the complete delivery of information and documents.
Investors can request advance confirmation of whether a transaction will be subject to screening under the FDI Law. Investors should consider, in their risk assessment of the likeability of screening, the sectors in which the target develops its activity, the essentiality of services provided by the target, its market share or on the impact of the transaction, among other factors.
To date, no transactions appear to have been blocked under the FDI legal framework.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2025 White & Case LLP