Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Now a full decade in publication, White & Case's 2025 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continues to provide a comprehensive look at foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations across various countries and regions worldwide.
In this edition, we continue to offer key datapoints that can help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the new set of challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions that span multiple countries.
FDI screening is continuously evolving, in fact, maturing. It is imperative to stay on top of the FDI requirements as transactions—be it mergers and acquisitions, investments, public equity offerings, or financial restructurings—are negotiated. Understanding the challenges, the potential remedies that could be required for approval and the proper allocation of FDI risk are key ingredients in avoiding unpleasant surprises related to timing, certainty and business plan execution.
With a new administration in the United States, a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, increased EU FDI cooperation, and the new geo-political lines and balances that are being drawn, the dynamics around FDI screening will be a driving consideration in the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully consummated in 2025, but understanding the evolving risks around FDI considerations will be critical.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-likeminded" countries.
Foreign direct investments, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, are generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
In the US, most FDI deals are approved without mitigation, but the landscape is evolving based on a combination of expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, increased rates of mitigation, further attention to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions.
The European Commission continues to be a driver of FDI screening across the EU, with Member States now moving toward coordinated enforcement.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and extensive interpretation of the Austrian FDI regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning of the M&A process.
The Belgian FDI screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidelines that help parties navigate it.
In 2024, Bulgaria established an FDI screening mechanism. Foreign investors' obligation to file for investment clearance did not become effective in 2024, but this should change soon.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive, and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia's FDI screening mechanism closed its first effective year in 2024.
FDI deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French FDI screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's FDI review continued in full swing in 2024, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Hungarian FDI regulation stands as a rock amid global economic storms, although there were few major changes in 2024.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review more tan ten years old and continuously expanding its reach.
The law in Latvia provides for sectoral FDI regimes for specific corporate M&A, real estate dealings and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review in Lithuania.
The Luxembourg FDI screening regime is now a year old, and the first notification filings have been made.
Malta's FDI regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may potentially be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment regime is in the process of being expanded, with more profound changes expected in the future.
After revision of the Polish FDI regime in 2024, the way the authorities are assessing transactions is evolving.
In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared to other EU countries, the Romanian FDI regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2024 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course taken earlier in 2023.
After two years of foreign investment regulation in Slovakia, a supportive climate for foreign investments remains.
Slovenia's updated FDI regime now extends to branch offices and introduces new challenges for foreign investors navigating critical sectors.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments are subject to scrutiny in Spain and, since then, additional formalities have been introduced, specifically by a developing FDI regulation that entered into force on September 1, 2023. The FDI analysis is becoming increasingly crucial in the context of investments in Spain.
In its second year of operation, the Swedish FDI Act has become a standard component of a large portion of all transactions involving Swedish companies.
Apart from limited sector-specific regulations, there is currently no general FDI regime in Switzerland. An FDI Act is expected to come into force in 2026 at the earliest.
Strengthening Türkiye's position as a key investment hub remains a government priority.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
FDI in the UK is covered by the National Security and Investment Act 2021, and in 2024 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's FDI regimes underwent some modifications in 2024, designed to streamline the process of carrying out investments.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, opening up market access and lowering investment thresholds into listed companies.
FDI continues to be an area of focus for the Indian government, which has announced plans to attract further foreign investment into the country.
The Japanese government expands business sectors subject to Japan's FDI regime to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea continues to welcome foreign investment, offering enhanced incentive packages and easing regulations while heightening scrutiny over transactions involving strategic industrial.
New Zealand has recently seen a period of stabilization of the overseas investment regime. However, following the formation of the coalition government at the end of 2023, this government has proposed significant changes to the overseas investment rules for 2025, making it easier for overseas investors to acquire New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote FDI under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign and PRC investors.
In 2024, Bulgaria established an FDI screening mechanism. Foreign investors' obligation to file for investment clearance did not become effective in 2024, but this should change soon.
Explore Trendscape Our take on the interconnected global trends that are shaping the business climate for our clients.
Nikolai Gouginski, Valentin Bojilov and Vladislav Antonov (Djingov, Gouginski, Kyutchukov & Velichkov) authored this publication
While the new legislation introducing FDI screening entered into force on March 12, 2024, the relevant foreign investors' obligation to file for FDI clearance is not effective until the executive branch has instituted additional implementing regulations.
A foreign investor intending to make a covered FDI must file for the investment's prior clearance. The "foreign investor" concept encompasses investors based outside of the EU—"non-EU persons" —and includes any individual who has made, or intends to make, an FDI in Bulgaria, provided they are not a national of an EU Member State; and any legal entity that has made, or intends to make, an FDI in Bulgaria, provided it is seated outside an EU Member State.
Any legal entity—a "deemed non-EU entity" —seated in an EU Member State but controlled by a non-EU person or another person (not necessarily an incorporated person) organized under the laws of a country that is not an EU Member State is also considered to be a foreign investor.
Additionally, any legal entity or other person (not necessarily an incorporated person) which, although seated in an EU Member State, is affected by a contract or internal rules by virtue of which the relevant investment of that person is directly or indirectly controlled by one or several individuals or legal entities that are established outside the EU; or makes the investment in its own name but for the account of a non-EU person or a deemed non-EU entity, by virtue of an agreement, is considered to be a foreign investor.
To be subject to FDI screening, the relevant FDI must have potential effects in the areas covered by article 4, paragraph 1 of the EU Investment Screening Regulation, and: result in the acquisition of at least 10 percent of the capital of an undertaking that operates in Bulgaria, or the investment's amount will exceed €2 million; or result in the acquisition of at least 10 percent of the capital of an undertaking that operates in Bulgaria and performs high-tech activities; or the investment qualifies as a "new investment" exceeding €2 million.
The quantitative criteria, however, will be disregarded—so that even small but substantively in-scope investments will trigger FDI screening—if there is, directly or indirectly, non-EU governmental participation in the foreign investor's capital. That extension of the FDI screening requirement to small investments will not apply where the non-EU governmental participation is linked to such "low-risk" countries as may be designated by the Bulgarian parliament. The quantitative criteria do not apply to FDIs by a foreign investor from Russia or Belarus, or FDIs in the production of oil-derived energy products and related critical infrastructure.
FDI screening is conducted by a specialized inter-agency council—the Screening Council—which is composed of specifically designated representatives of various governmental agencies. The Screening Council is supported by a secretariat within the Council of Ministers (the Bulgarian cabinet).
A template screening application sets the scope of the information about the investor, the investment and the target (if relevant) and the supporting documents that should be provided.
When assessing an FDI, the Screening Council considers whether the FDI is likely to affect security or public order, with respect to its potential to impact any of the areas covered by article 4 of the EU Investment Screening Regulation. It also considers whether the FDI is likely to affect security or public order, due to: the exercise of direct or indirect control, through equity or financing, over the foreign investor by non-EU government, including via public authorities or armed forces; the past involvement of the foreign investor in activities considered to have affected the security or the public order in an EU Member State; or a high level of risk of the foreign investor being involved in illegal or criminal activities.
The Screening Council has broad discretion to request information and documents, to appoint experts and solicit opinions from third parties and governmental agencies.
The timeline of review is 45 calendar days as of registration of the application. There is an option for a single extension by 30 additional days. If within this timeline the Screening Council objects to the FDI, the timeline is extended by up to six additional months for the negotiation of commitments.
An FDI screening application must be submitted to the Investment Promotion Agency. It has three days to complete formality checks, and up to seven days to request additional documents or corrective steps, if necessary. When complete, the Investment Agency transfers the application to the secretariat.
The substantive review process starts when the secretariat registers the application. It is structured as a process that may go through several consecutive stages, each one with its own timeline.
The first stage of the review is carried solely by the Secretariat. Within 14 days of commencement of the review, the secretariat recommends to the Screening Council one of two options: either to adopt a "no objections" decision; or begin complex assessment of the FDI.
The next stage of the review is carried out by the Screening Council. Within 14 days of receipt of the recommendation by the Secretariat, it either allows the FDI without complex assessment, or begins complex assessment.
If the Screening Council decides to allow the FDI without complex assessment, the process moves to the next stage, where each institution or agency representative sitting on the Screening Council has 14 days to object to the decision for approval without complex assessment.
If an objection is returned, the Screening Council conducts a complex assessment.
If there is no objection within the 14-day period, the Screening Council issues permission for implementation of the FDI.
Complex assessment is a distinct stage of the review. It is conducted by the Screening Council at its discretion or upon the objection of a representative or institutional member of the Screening Council. Complex assessment must be concluded within the 45 + 30 days review timeline, unless the Screening Council communicates objections to the FDI.
Following the conclusion of the complex assessment, the Screening Council will either approve the FDI; approve the FDI conditionally; or reject the screening application, thus prohibiting the investment.
Where the Screening Council objects to the FDI, its objections are communicated to the investor. This stops the clock of the review timeline. The investor and the Screening Council may then commence negotiations to agree on appropriate conditions under which the FDI may proceed. Negotiations must be completed within six months and conclude with execution of a written document either setting out the terms of the agreed conditions, or confirming the lack of agreement on appropriate conditions.
The following conditions may be adopted: restriction of the equity participation of the foreign investor to a threshold of 20 percent (10 percent if the target is involved in high-tech industries); implementation of measures aimed at the protection of personal data, the security of information or otherwise (upon proposal by a relevant regulator); or introduction of special voting or management rights in favor of the government (applicable in the context of privatizations only).
If negotiations conclude without an agreement on conditions, the Screening Council issues a final decision rejecting the FDI screening application.
Decisions of the Screening Council are subject to judicial review by the administrative courts.
The realistic timeline for the entry into force of the FDI screening mechanism is the first quarter of 2025. First challenges to the FDI screening may likely relate to the establishment of the institutional set-up, including the timely designation and appointment of individual representatives on the Screening Council from all institutional members. Given the strict timeline of review and the multi-staged nature of the review process where different units of the government get involved, the creation of operational cohesion among them would be a prime challenge.
From a substantive law point of view, the issues that would likely come up ahead of others may relate to a potential limitation of application of the FDI screening to non-public investors from designated "low risk" countries and the need to shape the boundaries of the substantive scope of review.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2025 White & Case LLP