Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Now in its eighth year of publication, White & Case's 2024 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews provides a comprehensive look at foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations in more than 40 countries worldwide.
In this edition, we continue to offer key datapoints that can help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the new set of challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions that span multiple countries.
FDI screening is continuously evolving, in fact, maturing. Stakeholders in the process, in particular FDI regulatory authorities in allied countries, are communicating and learning from each other. It is imperative to stay on top of the FDI requirements as transactions—be it mergers and acquisitions, investments, public equity offerings, debt structurings or financial restructurings—are negotiated. Understanding the potential remedies that could be required for approval and proper allocation of FDI risk are key ingredients in avoiding unpleasant surprises related to timing, certainty and business plan execution.
The number of national FDI regimes and regulatory enhancements is growing around the world, particularly in Europe, with no harmonization in terms of process and timelines. FDI regulators, at least from allied nations, are collaborating and learning from each other.
FDI regulators interpret their jurisdiction and authority broadly, especially if they believe it is in the national interest. Many regulators have "call-in," "ex officio," or "non-notified" authority. There is increasing coordination in the European Union (EU) between FDI authorities with the support of the European Commission.
Despite increased regulation, most cross-border transactions are successfully consummated, although there has been an increase in the number of cases clearing with remedies.
The origin of the investor remains a key concern for Western regulators. For example, China and Russia are included more and more in the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' regular Q&A, asking broader and more invasive questions.
Investors conducting cross-border business need to understand FDI restrictions as they are today, and how these laws are evolving over time, to avoid disruption to realizing synergies, achieving technological development and integration, and ultimately securing liquidity.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
FDI, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, is generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
Most deals are approved without mitigation, but the CFIUS landscape has continued evolving based on a combination of expanded jurisdiction, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, increased rates of mitigation, further attention on monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions.
The European Commission continues to be a driver of FDI screening across the EU, with Member States now moving toward coordinated enforcement.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and extensive interpretation of the Austrian FDI regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning of the M&A process.
The Belgian FDI screening regime entered into force in July 2023. In its early days, investors and authorities alike are coming to grips with the new regime and the guidelines that help parties navigate it.
A bill contemplating the creation of a foreign direct investment screening mechanism in Bulgaria is currently before the Bulgarian parliament.
The new Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia's foreign direct investment screening mechanism entered into force on September 1, 2023.
FDI deals are generally not blocked in Finland.
French FDI screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's FDI review continued in full swing in 2023, with further significant updates expected in 2024.
FDI screening in Hungary – forever changing regulation, no change in its importance.
Ireland is expected to enact its FDI screening legislation in 2024.
Italy's Golden Power Law is now more than 10 years old and is continuously expanding its reach.
The law in Latvia provides for sectoral FDI regimes for specific corporate M&A, real estate dealings and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review.
In 2023, Luxembourg adopted a national screening mechanism for foreign direct investments.
Malta's FDI regime regulates transactions that must be notified to the authorities and, in some cases, will be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands, complementing its existing sector-specific regulations, has introduced a general investment screening mechanism to enhance the protection of its national security across a broader range of sectors.
The foreign direct investment regime in Norway is subject to upcoming changes, with further changes expected to come.
The Polish FDI regime – ambiguous rules, no blocking decisions and evolving market practice.
In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.
The Romanian regime regarding foreign direct investment appears to have become more stable in 2023, but continues to surprise.
Russian laws regulating foreign investments have been considerably amended in 2023 to extend the scope of the laws as well as to strengthen control in this sphere.
The new Foreign Investments Screening Act entered into force in Slovakia on March 1, 2023.
Since May 31, 2020, certain foreign investments into Slovenian companies can be subject to foreign direct investments review. Incorporation of new companies and business units can also be screened.
Certain foreign direct investments in Spain are subject to scrutiny under the Law 19/2003 (Law on the movement of capital and foreign economic transactions and on certain measures for the prevention of money laundering). These restrictions started back in 2020 and, since then, additional formalities have been introduced, specifically by the new FDI regulation, which entered into force on September 1, 2023.
In December 2023, Sweden adopted and implemented a new FDI regime, meaning that a general FDI screening mechanism now applies in relation to investments in certain Swedish businesses.
Historically, Switzerland has been very liberal regarding foreign investments. However, there has recently been increased political pressure to create a more structured legal regime for foreign investment.
Making Türkiye an attractive investment destination continues to be a priority for the government.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
The UK introduced new legislation governing FDI in 2022, which also captures domestic investment in certain sectors.
The Western Balkan region (Balkan countries out of European Union) remain increasingly accessible to foreign investment, without established Foreign Direct Investment ("FDI") screening mechanism, with limited requirements for licensing approvals and ownership thresholds, apart from specific sectors.
Australia's stringent foreign investment regulations, overseen by the Treasurer and FIRB, safeguard national interests and security. The framework, including the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 and recent updates like the Australia-UK Free Trade Agreement, emphasizes transparency and accountability, with new penalties and registration requirements enhancing oversight and compliance.
While restricting the data transfer relating to national security, China issued guidelines to further optimize its foreign investment environment.
India continues to be an attractive destination for foreign investment, ranking as the world's eighth-largest recipient of FDI in 2023.
Certain businesses related to "Specifically Designated Critical Commodities" have been designated "core" sectors subject to Japan's FDI regime, FEFTA.
The Republic of Korea continues to welcome foreign investment, with the government actively seeking to ease regulations and update the regulatory framework to be in line with global standards.
After a number of years of amendments under the OIA from 2018 to 2021, New Zealand has seen a period of stabilization of the overseas investment regime. However, following the recent election and change of government in New Zealand, further changes are expected to better support investments in build-to-rent housing developments.
Taiwan continues to promote FDI under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign and PRC investors.
Estonia's foreign direct investment screening mechanism entered into force on September 1, 2023.
Kevin Gerretz (Ellex Circle Law Firms) authored this publication
On September 1, 2023, by virtue of the Foreign Investment Reliability Assessment Act (FIRAA) entering into force, an FDI screening mechanism was eventually established in Estonia. The first investments were already caught by the regime in 2023. Going forward, future acquisitions of Estonian targets should be mindful of the Estonian FDI regime once there is a non-EU element within the ownership structure of the acquirer as already acquisitions—including indirectly—of at least 10 percent of shares or votes may trigger a filing.
The FIRAA applies to any direct or indirect acquisition of qualifying holding in, control over, or a part of a target undertaking by a foreign investor, including the undertaking's assets.
A qualifying holding is defined as holding at least 10 percent of shares, or at least 10 percent of votes, or giving significant influence over the management by other means.
Control is defined as: holding of the majority of votes represented by shares; the right to appoint or remove the majority of management members; control over the majority of votes pursuant to an agreement entered into with other shareholders; or exercise or the power to exercise dominant influence or control.
The term "foreign investor" within the meaning of the FIRAA includes a natural person who is a national of a third country (in case of dual-nationality, at least one nationality of a third country) or stateless; an undertaking (within the meaning of competition law) which is established under the laws of a third country; and any undertaking under the control of a natural person or another undertaking specified as a foreign investor. "Third country" is defined as any non-EU country.
The FIRAA provides an exhaustive list of economic sectors and/or criteria to determine if the target will be subject to the mandatory FDI review process and approval.
The types of targets in scope include providers of vital services (such as suppliers of electricity, natural gas or liquid fuel; providers of data transmission services, payment services and cash circulation services; providers of district heating and water supply and sewage); all state-owned companies in which the state has a qualifying holding; suppliers of military or dual-use goods to governmental bodies; providers of nationwide TV and radio services, newspapers, magazines and online or print news; railway infrastructure managers, certified operators of aerodromes, heliports and air navigation service providers; as well as operators of Estonian maritime ports that are a part of the trans-European transport network.
If the relevant transaction is subject to the FIRAA, the law provides for a process of review and approval of the foreign investment to determine whether the foreign investment may bring about negative effects on Estonian (or any other EU Member State's) security and public order in regard to the foreign investor's ownership, economic activities or financing, and the economic sector in which the target operates.
The FDI regime is mandatory and suspensory in nature, meaning that if the transaction is subject to review in accordance with the FIRAA, the foreign investor must file an application for review, and the transaction is subject to a standstill obligation until the clearance has been issued by the competent authority, namely the Consumer Protection and Technical Regulatory Authority. The filing includes submission of an Estonian filing form and English Form B notification under Regulation (EU) 2019/452, together with all relevant annexes, including transaction documents. Only upon submission of a complete filing (as per discretion of the competent authority) is the review process initiated and the clock starts running.
If the foreign investment would be otherwise blocked under the FIRAA, the authority may clear the foreign investment conditionally, whereby the foreign investor or the target is obligated to offer remedies to avoid risks to the security or public order of Estonia or any other EU Member State, including to divest a certain shareholding in the target or maintain existing service or supply agreements.
The authority may annul an earlier clearance after it has been issued on certain grounds, including where the investor does not comply with conditions specified in the decision (in case of a conditional clearance) or the investor has submitted false or misleading information and/or documents that constituted a decisive factor for the clearance. Upon annulment, the foreign investor or the target is required to immediately reverse the transaction by returning to the initial state of affairs to the maximum extent possible.
The process can take up to 180 calendar days from the date of submission of a complete application to the authority. By default, the authority is required to adopt a decision within 30 calendar days from the submission of a complete application.
The process may be extended once by up to 90 calendar days where this is necessary for the assessment of the foreign investment's impact, or another EU Member State, or the European Commission intends to provide comments on the foreign investment in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/452. Furthermore, where clearance can be given only conditionally, the authority may extend the above deadlines by up to 60 calendar days for discussions on remedies.
Where a transaction gives rise to the risk of being subject to FDI review and approval in Estonia, non-EU investors should consider filing the application with the authority at least 30 calendar days prior to the planned closing. For a foreign investment that risks having an adverse effect on the security and public order of either Estonia or another EU Member State, the time of filing an application should be brought further forward to account for the potential extension of the review process up to a total of 180 calendar days.
Given that the Estonian regime has no turnover thresholds and catches also indirect acquisitions of at least 10 percent of shares or votes in target undertakings, an Estonian FDI filing may pop up from the most unexpected places—a consideration that foreign investors with a non-EU element should be mindful of when directing investments into Estonia.
Looking ahead, new transactions are expected to be caught by the newly established regime, which should also give more insight into the approach to be adopted by the competent authority both in terms of substantial assessment and satisfaction of filing requirements.
Although the FIRAA was established only in September 2023, the number of target undertakings caught by the regime may already double in 2024 as a result of a related legislative initiative, which seeks to reform the regulation applicable to providers of vital services and increase the scope of providers of vital services by approximately 350 entities.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2024 White & Case LLP