Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Now in its eighth year of publication, White & Case's 2024 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews provides a comprehensive look at foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations in more than 40 countries worldwide.
In this edition, we continue to offer key datapoints that can help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the new set of challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions that span multiple countries.
FDI screening is continuously evolving, in fact, maturing. Stakeholders in the process, in particular FDI regulatory authorities in allied countries, are communicating and learning from each other. It is imperative to stay on top of the FDI requirements as transactions—be it mergers and acquisitions, investments, public equity offerings, debt structurings or financial restructurings—are negotiated. Understanding the potential remedies that could be required for approval and proper allocation of FDI risk are key ingredients in avoiding unpleasant surprises related to timing, certainty and business plan execution.
The number of national FDI regimes and regulatory enhancements is growing around the world, particularly in Europe, with no harmonization in terms of process and timelines. FDI regulators, at least from allied nations, are collaborating and learning from each other.
FDI regulators interpret their jurisdiction and authority broadly, especially if they believe it is in the national interest. Many regulators have "call-in," "ex officio," or "non-notified" authority. There is increasing coordination in the European Union (EU) between FDI authorities with the support of the European Commission.
Despite increased regulation, most cross-border transactions are successfully consummated, although there has been an increase in the number of cases clearing with remedies.
The origin of the investor remains a key concern for Western regulators. For example, China and Russia are included more and more in the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' regular Q&A, asking broader and more invasive questions.
Investors conducting cross-border business need to understand FDI restrictions as they are today, and how these laws are evolving over time, to avoid disruption to realizing synergies, achieving technological development and integration, and ultimately securing liquidity.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
FDI, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, is generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
Most deals are approved without mitigation, but the CFIUS landscape has continued evolving based on a combination of expanded jurisdiction, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, increased rates of mitigation, further attention on monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions.
The European Commission continues to be a driver of FDI screening across the EU, with Member States now moving toward coordinated enforcement.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and extensive interpretation of the Austrian FDI regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning of the M&A process.
The Belgian FDI screening regime entered into force in July 2023. In its early days, investors and authorities alike are coming to grips with the new regime and the guidelines that help parties navigate it.
A bill contemplating the creation of a foreign direct investment screening mechanism in Bulgaria is currently before the Bulgarian parliament.
The new Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia's foreign direct investment screening mechanism entered into force on September 1, 2023.
FDI deals are generally not blocked in Finland.
French FDI screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's FDI review continued in full swing in 2023, with further significant updates expected in 2024.
FDI screening in Hungary – forever changing regulation, no change in its importance.
Ireland is expected to enact its FDI screening legislation in 2024.
Italy's Golden Power Law is now more than 10 years old and is continuously expanding its reach.
The law in Latvia provides for sectoral FDI regimes for specific corporate M&A, real estate dealings and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review.
In 2023, Luxembourg adopted a national screening mechanism for foreign direct investments.
Malta's FDI regime regulates transactions that must be notified to the authorities and, in some cases, will be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands, complementing its existing sector-specific regulations, has introduced a general investment screening mechanism to enhance the protection of its national security across a broader range of sectors.
The foreign direct investment regime in Norway is subject to upcoming changes, with further changes expected to come.
The Polish FDI regime – ambiguous rules, no blocking decisions and evolving market practice.
In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.
The Romanian regime regarding foreign direct investment appears to have become more stable in 2023, but continues to surprise.
Russian laws regulating foreign investments have been considerably amended in 2023 to extend the scope of the laws as well as to strengthen control in this sphere.
The new Foreign Investments Screening Act entered into force in Slovakia on March 1, 2023.
Since May 31, 2020, certain foreign investments into Slovenian companies can be subject to foreign direct investments review. Incorporation of new companies and business units can also be screened.
Certain foreign direct investments in Spain are subject to scrutiny under the Law 19/2003 (Law on the movement of capital and foreign economic transactions and on certain measures for the prevention of money laundering). These restrictions started back in 2020 and, since then, additional formalities have been introduced, specifically by the new FDI regulation, which entered into force on September 1, 2023.
In December 2023, Sweden adopted and implemented a new FDI regime, meaning that a general FDI screening mechanism now applies in relation to investments in certain Swedish businesses.
Historically, Switzerland has been very liberal regarding foreign investments. However, there has recently been increased political pressure to create a more structured legal regime for foreign investment.
Making Türkiye an attractive investment destination continues to be a priority for the government.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
The UK introduced new legislation governing FDI in 2022, which also captures domestic investment in certain sectors.
The Western Balkan region (Balkan countries out of European Union) remain increasingly accessible to foreign investment, without established Foreign Direct Investment ("FDI") screening mechanism, with limited requirements for licensing approvals and ownership thresholds, apart from specific sectors.
Australia's stringent foreign investment regulations, overseen by the Treasurer and FIRB, safeguard national interests and security. The framework, including the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 and recent updates like the Australia-UK Free Trade Agreement, emphasizes transparency and accountability, with new penalties and registration requirements enhancing oversight and compliance.
While restricting the data transfer relating to national security, China issued guidelines to further optimize its foreign investment environment.
India continues to be an attractive destination for foreign investment, ranking as the world's eighth-largest recipient of FDI in 2023.
Certain businesses related to "Specifically Designated Critical Commodities" have been designated "core" sectors subject to Japan's FDI regime, FEFTA.
The Republic of Korea continues to welcome foreign investment, with the government actively seeking to ease regulations and update the regulatory framework to be in line with global standards.
After a number of years of amendments under the OIA from 2018 to 2021, New Zealand has seen a period of stabilization of the overseas investment regime. However, following the recent election and change of government in New Zealand, further changes are expected to better support investments in build-to-rent housing developments.
Taiwan continues to promote FDI under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign and PRC investors.
The new Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The Foreign Investments Screening Act was passed by the Czech Parliament on February 3, 2021, and took full effect on may 1, 2021. It establishes rights and duties of foreign investors whose ultimate beneficial owner is from non-EU countries. It also set screening requirements in relation to certain target persons or owners of target objects in Czechia, which pose important security or public order concerns on the Czech Republic. The relevant entrusted authority remains the Czech Ministry of Industry and Trade.
In general, the FDI investor should be the applicant. Request for approval of FDI or a consultation proposal is to be submitted in a form specified by Government Decree No. 178/2021 Coll., signed by a statutory representative of the applicant. Together with the application for the approval of FDI, the applicant shall submit a questionnaire containing additional information about the foreign investment.
Under Section 33 and the Act No. 500/2004 Coll. of the Rules of Administrative Procedure as amended, the applicant may be represented in the proceeding of the investment screening by a proxy with power of attorney. The power of attorney needs to be signed by the party to the proceedings —the applicant —but the signature does not need to be officially certified.
Details or substance of the deals reviewed have not been disclosed. However, based on information available in the public domain, cases that have been reviewed since the act came into force included ten consultations, three of which proceeded to the full screening procedure. Two cases were reviewed in the screening regime only. In one case, the case was commenced through a filing by the investor as required by law; in the second case, the ministry started the screening procedure on its own initiative.
Foreign investment into the following targets will require prior approval from the ministry: a target person who performs manufacturing, research, development, innovation or organization of the life cycle of military material, or into a target object through which the said activity is performed; a target person who operates a critical infrastructure element determined by the relevant central administrative authority; a target person who is an administrator of an information system belonging to critical information infrastructure, administrator of a communication system belonging to critical information infrastructure, administrator of an information system belonging to an essential service, or operator of an essential service; or a target person who develops or manufactures dual-use goods, or target object through which such goods are developed or manufactured.
Even if an FDI does not require prior approval, the Czech government has the power to commence ex post facto review of an FDI if it determines that such FDI may endanger the security or internal or public order of the Czech Republic. Such investments can be screened by the ministry retrospectively for up to five years from the date of the investment. When deciding whether the FDI endangers the security of the Czech Republic or its internal or public order, the ministry would usually look at the FDI's potential impact on a number of areas.
These include: infrastructure, including energy, transportation, water management and medical infrastructure; data processing and storing infrastructure; aviation and cosmic infrastructure; defense, and other infrastructure important for the security of the Czech Republic and its internal or public order; as well as access to land and property essential for the usage of such infrastructure.
The impact on access to critical technologies and dual-use goods, including AI, robotics, semiconductor and cybersecurity technologies, aviation and rocket technologies, defense technologies, chemical technologies, energy-storing technologies, quantum and nuclear technologies, as well as nanotechnologies and biotechnologies is also considered.
The ministry would usually also consider access to supplies that are related to energy, raw material or food security; security of access to information that is important for the security of the Czech Republic or its internal or public order, including personal data, or ability to control this information; the possibility of significant influence over public opinion through information spread by the media; critical information infrastructure, important information systems and essential services; non-military objects important for state security; and other technologies, malicious use of which poses a potential threat to the Czech Republic or its internal or public order, or any other factors important from the perspective of security of the Czech Republic or its internal or public order.
Where the foreign investor has an intention to carry out an FDI that does not require prior approval under the act, they may nonetheless ask the ministry for a consultation as to whether it might be considered as endangering security, or the internal or public order of the Czech Republic. If the result of this consultation is negative, the ministry will not screen this investment ex officio. The consultation is voluntary except for FDI directed at a target who owns a nationwide radio or TV broadcast license, or who is a publisher of a periodical that has an overall minimum average circulation of 100,000 prints per day in the past calendar year.
The screening of FDI that was not found to pose a risk takes 90 days. The screening of an FDI that has been identified as risk-prone, including discussion time required by the government of the Czech Republic, is 135 days.
These dates can be extended by 30 days in complicated cases. In certain cases, such as where the foreign investor has to enter into negotiations with the ministry regarding conditions surrounding the FDI, the above timelines may be paused.
If an investor were to submit a request for consultation, the ministry must respond within 45 days.
Potential investors are encouraged to take steps to confirm whether they fall under the definition of a foreign investor or whether the envisaged activity represents an FDI that requires prior review under the Act, before finalizing any transaction document.
If an investor is unsure about whether an FDI may bring security or public policy concerns to the Czech government, the investor may want to consider submitting a request for consultation in order to speed up any potential FDI application process.
The ministry anticipates that it would have assessed more FDIs in 2023 compared to 2022, given the more promising economic outlook and an expectation that there would be accelerated willingness to invest into Czechia.
The ministry is also taking steps to speed up the screening process by providing more guidance to large investment institutions on how to approach FDI impact assessments. A second annual report will likely be published by the ministry in the coming year, which will provide further information and statistics on FDI into Czechia.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2024 White & Case LLP