Canada
The Canadian government announced a strict framework to evaluate foreign investments in the critical minerals sector by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from “non-likeminded” countries.
Now in its seventh year of annual publication, White & Case's Foreign Direct Investment Reviews provides a comprehensive look into rapidly evolving foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations in approximately 40 national jurisdictions and two regions. This 2023 edition includes more than 15 new jurisdictions in addition to those covered in previous editions and summarizes high-level principles in the European Union and Middle East. Our expansion in coverage reflects the rapid global proliferation of FDI regimes and our market leading position in the field.
FDI regimes are wide-reaching in scope, from national security to public health and safety, law and order, technological superiority, and continuity and integrity of critical supply chains. They are divergent with respect to jurisdictional triggers across countries, and are almost always a black-box process.
The following are some general observations, in large part based on the 2022 CFIUS and EU annual reports:
Investors conducting cross-border business need to understand FDI restrictions as they are today—and how these laws are evolving over time—to avoid disruption to realizing synergies, achieving technological development and integration, and ultimately securing liquidity.
We would like to extend a special thank-you to all of our external authors, who have provided some insightful commentary on the FDI regimes in a number of important jurisdictions. The names of these individual contributors and their law firms are provided throughout this publication.
We would also like to extend a special thank-you to James Hsiao of our Hong Kong office and Tim Sensenig of our Washington, DC office for their tireless efforts and dedication to the publication of this edition.
The Canadian government announced a strict framework to evaluate foreign investments in the critical minerals sector by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from “non-likeminded” countries.
Foreign direct investments, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, are generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
Most deals are approved, but expanded jurisdiction, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on national security considerations, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions have changed the landscape.
Driven by the European Commission's guidance, Member States keep expanding their investment screening regimes. A similar trend is observed in Europe at large.
In Austria, the Austrian Federal Investment Control Act (Investitionskontrollgesetz or the ICA) introduced a new, fully fledged regime for the screening of Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) and came into effect on July 25, 2020. With its wide scope of application and extensive interpretation by the competent authority, the number of screened investments has soared.
Belgium implements an FDI screening regime by July 1, 2023.
The new Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, and completed its first full year in operation in 2022.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia will have in place an FDI review regime by September 2023.
Deals are generally not blocked in Finland.
In France, FDI screening authorities have issued new guidelines to improve the transparency of the FDI process.
The Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy continues to tighten FDI control, but the investment climate remains liberal in principle.
The need for FDI screening remains in focus for deals with Hungarian dimensions.
Ireland anticipates adopting and implementing an FDI screening regime by Q1 2023.
Italian "Golden Power Law:" Ten years old and continuously expanding its reach.
The Russian Federation's invasion of Ukraine has precipitated the inclusion of provisions blocking Russian and Belarussian nationals from direct investment in a number of sectors.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review.
Luxembourg has introduced a bill of law to regulate foreign direct investments. The law is currently being discussed before the Luxembourg Parliament.
Malta's recently introduced FDI regime captures a substantial number of transactions that must be notified to the authorities and, in some cases, will be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues opening to foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands prepares for its first effective year of new FDI regulation.
Changes in the geopolitical situation have resulted in increased awareness of security threats caused by strategic acquisitions and access to sensitive technology. The ongoing review of the FDI regulations in Norway is expected to result in more effective mechanisms to identify and deal with security threats in transactions and investors should be prepared to take this into account when planning future investments in Norwegian companies that engage in sensitive activities.
The Polish FDI regime governing the acquisitions of covered entities by non-EEA and non-OECD buyers has been extended until July 2025.
Transactions involving foreign natural or legal persons that allow direct or indirect control over strategic assets may be subject to FDI screening.
The Romanian regime regarding foreign direct investment has undergone a major change in 2022, when new legislation was enacted, and is aimed at implementing relevant European Union legislation.
The Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS) tends to impose increased scrutiny in the sphere of foreign investments and has developed a number of amendments to the foreign investments laws that are aimed at eliminating legislative gaps in this sphere.
On November 29, 2022, Slovakia, for the first time, adopted full-fledged foreign direct investment legislation. This legislation is effective as of March 1, 2023.
Since May 31, 2020, certain foreign investments into Slovenian companies can be subject to review. Acquisition of real estate related to critical infrastructure may also be subject to review.
The restrictions imposed by the Spanish government on foreign direct investments during the COVID-19 outbreak have remained after the pandemic.
Other than security-related screening, Sweden is currently still without a general FDI screening mechanism.
Historically, Switzerland has been very liberal regarding foreign investments. However, there has recently been increased political pressure to create a more structured legal regime for foreign investment.
Making Türkiye an attractive investment destination continues to be a priority for the government.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
The UK’s National Security & Investment Act has now been in place for a year and has already made its mark, prohibiting deals on national security grounds and also requiring remedies in cases that are not subject to the mandatory notification requirement. We expect a continued tough approach over the next year as global geo-political tensions bring national security concerns to the fore.
Australia requires a wide variety of investments by foreign investors to be reviewed and approved before completion of the investment.
China has further developed its national security regulatory regime by promulgating measures on cybersecurity review and security assessment of cross-border data transfer.
India continues to be an attractive destination for foreign investment, ranking as the world's seventh-largest recipient of FDI in 2021.
The Japanese government continues to review filings and refine its approach under the FDI regime following the 2019 amendments.
Korea is increasing the level of scrutiny of foreign investments due to growing concerns over the transfer of sensitive technologies.
Recent legislative reforms have increased the New Zealand government's ability to take national interest considerations into account, but have also looked to exclude lower-risk transactions from consent requirements.
All FDIs are subject to prior approval, but the investment climate is welcoming and liberal.
The Russian Federation's invasion of Ukraine has precipitated the inclusion of provisions blocking Russian and Belarussian nationals from direct investment in a number of sectors.
Liga Merwin and Tomass Brinkmanis (Ellex Circle Law Firms) authored this publication
While there is no general obligation to notify investments in Latvia by foreign investors, rules in several sectors either prohibit foreign direct investment without notification or block foreign investment outright. Such sectors are:
The National Security Law defines companies of significance to national security as a company registered in the Republic of Latvia that:
Additionally, irrespective of the type of investor (local or foreign), objects with "critical infrastructure" status (Critical Infrastructure Objects) cannot be transferred without the permission of the Cabinet of Ministers. Critical infrastructure objects are categorized as:
Critical Infrastructure Objects are identified by various state agencies; however, such identification is not publicly available and is considered a state secret. Persons already in possession of these objects are aware of the status.
Acquisition of land as FDI is subject to the receipt of consent from the local municipality council if such transactions are allowed by law:
Gambling company-related transactions are also restricted, pursuant to the Law on Gambling and Lotteries:
The percentage of foreign members or stockholders in the share capital of a capital company cannot exceed 49 percent. Foreign members do not include investors from the Member States of the European Union, the States of European Economic Area and the Member States of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (residents). Different regulations for foreign investments provided for by international agreements ratified by the Parliament may also provide different cases. Change of investors as allowed by law must further be notified to Lotteries and Gambling Supervision Inspection in accordance with the Law on Gambling and Lotteries, which further specifies licensing requirements.
No significant updates exist regarding the FDI regimes in 2021 for Latvia.
As regards acquisitions of land, different rules apply whether the land to be acquired is located in urban administrative territories or rural administrative territories and whether the intended use of the land is agricultural or other:
Agricultural land and land with other designated use located in urban administrative territories may be purchased by:
Agricultural land and land with other designated uses located in rural administrative territories may be purchased by:
The purchase of agricultural land in rural administrative territories by investors mentioned above must be approved by the relevant institution. Other foreign investors not listed above (the "Other Foreign Rural Land Investors") may purchase land in rural areas with other designated use only, which requires approval by the relevant institution.
For companies of significance to national security, the Cabinet of Ministers must be notified and permission must be acquired for the following activities:
In relation to capital companies:
In relation to partnerships:
The requirements for acquisitions of land and agricultural land does not apply to acquirers of agricultural land, if the total area of agricultural land in the acquirer's possession does not exceed ten hectares for natural persons or five hectares for legal persons or if the agricultural land to be acquired is the result of insolvency proceedings.
In determining the FDI review, the Cabinet of Ministers shall evaluate the restrictions on the rights of the person, its commensurability with the national security interests, and the opinion of a state security institution, as well as the conformity with the principle of legitimate expectations.
The Cabinet of Ministers may decide to refuse the permit if:
For the acquisition of land, the municipality council makes a decision based on all received information to evaluate whether the acquirer meets the requirements in the law, restrictions in the law are met, and indicated further use of the land is not in contradiction with the spatial plan or detailed plan of the municipality.
The Cabinet of Ministers shall make a decision within one month from the moment of receiving the application. The term can be prolonged to four months.
As mentioned above, the requirements and restrictions for FDI are quite imperative and defined broadly. As such, formal compliance to the requirements will not always result in permission and a positive outcome.
The Russian Federation's invasion of Ukraine has precipitated the inclusion of provisions blocking Russian and Belarussian nationals from direct investment in separate sectors.
In the ambit of national security, the trend will be even more rigorous checks and more stringent rules in the coming years.
Investors should make sure the contracts contain a contract termination clause should the relevant permissions not be granted.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2023 White & Case LLP