Canada
The Canadian government announced a strict framework to evaluate foreign investments in the critical minerals sector by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from “non-likeminded” countries.
Now in its seventh year of annual publication, White & Case's Foreign Direct Investment Reviews provides a comprehensive look into rapidly evolving foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations in approximately 40 national jurisdictions and two regions. This 2023 edition includes more than 15 new jurisdictions in addition to those covered in previous editions and summarizes high-level principles in the European Union and Middle East. Our expansion in coverage reflects the rapid global proliferation of FDI regimes and our market leading position in the field.
FDI regimes are wide-reaching in scope, from national security to public health and safety, law and order, technological superiority, and continuity and integrity of critical supply chains. They are divergent with respect to jurisdictional triggers across countries, and are almost always a black-box process.
The following are some general observations, in large part based on the 2022 CFIUS and EU annual reports:
Investors conducting cross-border business need to understand FDI restrictions as they are today—and how these laws are evolving over time—to avoid disruption to realizing synergies, achieving technological development and integration, and ultimately securing liquidity.
We would like to extend a special thank-you to all of our external authors, who have provided some insightful commentary on the FDI regimes in a number of important jurisdictions. The names of these individual contributors and their law firms are provided throughout this publication.
We would also like to extend a special thank-you to James Hsiao of our Hong Kong office and Tim Sensenig of our Washington, DC office for their tireless efforts and dedication to the publication of this edition.
The Canadian government announced a strict framework to evaluate foreign investments in the critical minerals sector by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from “non-likeminded” countries.
Foreign direct investments, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, are generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
Most deals are approved, but expanded jurisdiction, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on national security considerations, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions have changed the landscape.
Driven by the European Commission's guidance, Member States keep expanding their investment screening regimes. A similar trend is observed in Europe at large.
In Austria, the Austrian Federal Investment Control Act (Investitionskontrollgesetz or the ICA) introduced a new, fully fledged regime for the screening of Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) and came into effect on July 25, 2020. With its wide scope of application and extensive interpretation by the competent authority, the number of screened investments has soared.
Belgium implements an FDI screening regime by July 1, 2023.
The new Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, and completed its first full year in operation in 2022.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia will have in place an FDI review regime by September 2023.
Deals are generally not blocked in Finland.
In France, FDI screening authorities have issued new guidelines to improve the transparency of the FDI process.
The Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy continues to tighten FDI control, but the investment climate remains liberal in principle.
The need for FDI screening remains in focus for deals with Hungarian dimensions.
Ireland anticipates adopting and implementing an FDI screening regime by Q1 2023.
Italian "Golden Power Law:" Ten years old and continuously expanding its reach.
The Russian Federation's invasion of Ukraine has precipitated the inclusion of provisions blocking Russian and Belarussian nationals from direct investment in a number of sectors.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review.
Luxembourg has introduced a bill of law to regulate foreign direct investments. The law is currently being discussed before the Luxembourg Parliament.
Malta's recently introduced FDI regime captures a substantial number of transactions that must be notified to the authorities and, in some cases, will be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues opening to foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands prepares for its first effective year of new FDI regulation.
Changes in the geopolitical situation have resulted in increased awareness of security threats caused by strategic acquisitions and access to sensitive technology. The ongoing review of the FDI regulations in Norway is expected to result in more effective mechanisms to identify and deal with security threats in transactions and investors should be prepared to take this into account when planning future investments in Norwegian companies that engage in sensitive activities.
The Polish FDI regime governing the acquisitions of covered entities by non-EEA and non-OECD buyers has been extended until July 2025.
Transactions involving foreign natural or legal persons that allow direct or indirect control over strategic assets may be subject to FDI screening.
The Romanian regime regarding foreign direct investment has undergone a major change in 2022, when new legislation was enacted, and is aimed at implementing relevant European Union legislation.
The Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS) tends to impose increased scrutiny in the sphere of foreign investments and has developed a number of amendments to the foreign investments laws that are aimed at eliminating legislative gaps in this sphere.
On November 29, 2022, Slovakia, for the first time, adopted full-fledged foreign direct investment legislation. This legislation is effective as of March 1, 2023.
Since May 31, 2020, certain foreign investments into Slovenian companies can be subject to review. Acquisition of real estate related to critical infrastructure may also be subject to review.
The restrictions imposed by the Spanish government on foreign direct investments during the COVID-19 outbreak have remained after the pandemic.
Other than security-related screening, Sweden is currently still without a general FDI screening mechanism.
Historically, Switzerland has been very liberal regarding foreign investments. However, there has recently been increased political pressure to create a more structured legal regime for foreign investment.
Making Türkiye an attractive investment destination continues to be a priority for the government.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
The UK’s National Security & Investment Act has now been in place for a year and has already made its mark, prohibiting deals on national security grounds and also requiring remedies in cases that are not subject to the mandatory notification requirement. We expect a continued tough approach over the next year as global geo-political tensions bring national security concerns to the fore.
Australia requires a wide variety of investments by foreign investors to be reviewed and approved before completion of the investment.
China has further developed its national security regulatory regime by promulgating measures on cybersecurity review and security assessment of cross-border data transfer.
India continues to be an attractive destination for foreign investment, ranking as the world's seventh-largest recipient of FDI in 2021.
The Japanese government continues to review filings and refine its approach under the FDI regime following the 2019 amendments.
Korea is increasing the level of scrutiny of foreign investments due to growing concerns over the transfer of sensitive technologies.
Recent legislative reforms have increased the New Zealand government's ability to take national interest considerations into account, but have also looked to exclude lower-risk transactions from consent requirements.
All FDIs are subject to prior approval, but the investment climate is welcoming and liberal.
China has further developed its national security regulatory regime by promulgating measures on cybersecurity review and security assessment of cross-border data transfer.
In China, the Foreign Investment Law (FIL) and its implementation regulations create the framework for the foreign investment security review (FISR) system. The Measures for Security Review of Foreign Investments (the "FISR Measures") further develop the scope of FISR—nonetheless, the FISR Measures describe the targeted sectors in broad strokes, leaving substantial room for further interpretation and clarification.
In 2022, China continued to strengthen its national security regulatory regime by detailing additional cybersecurity and data security clarifications to its FISR system.
According to the FISR Measures, if a transaction falls within the scope of FISR, either the foreign investor or the Chinese party (each a "Filing Party") must file an application with the office of the working mechanism (the "FISR Office") before the commencement of the transaction in order to meet the regulatory filing requirements. If the Filing Parties fail to file an FISR application and commence a transaction, and the FISR Office determines that it falls within the scope of FISR, the FISR Office has the authority to require the Filing Parties to suspend the transaction and submit an FISR application.
In practice, various regulatory authorities will closely cooperate with each other in monitoring foreign investment activities in China. For example, if an antitrust filing is required for a transaction and such transaction is likely to fall within the scope of FISR, the antitrust regulatory authority may share the relevant information of such transaction with the FISR Office for further review and clearance before processing the antitrust filing. Based on the review of the relevant information, the FISR Office may notify one of the parties to a transaction to submit an FISR application.
Under the FISR Measures, the FISR Office has the authority to review a broad range of direct and indirect investment activities conducted by foreign investors, including:
Given the broad definition of foreign investments, we recommend that foreign investors evaluate carefully before the commencement of a transaction to avoid FISR compliance risks.
A foreign investment transaction is subject to FISR if:
Foreign investors will be deemed to have "actual control" over a target enterprise if: (i) foreign investors hold more than 50 percent of the equity interest in such enterprise; (ii) even if foreign investors hold less than 50 percent of the equity interest in such enterprise, such foreign investors can exert significant influence at the shareholder or board level by virtue of voting rights; or (iii) other circumstances under which foreign investors can exert significant influence over the operational decision making, personnel, finance and technology of the target enterprise.
In addition, although not explicitly stipulated under relevant laws and regulations, the FISR Office may consider the following factors in reviewing the FISR applications in practice:
The FISR Measures provide the typical timeline and process for the FISR review of a transaction:
During the FISR Office's review, parties to a transaction are prohibited from proceeding with a transaction. In other words, the FISR must be completed prior to the closing of a transaction.
In recent years, China has been making a sustained effort to strengthen its national security regulatory regime, including from a data security perspective. In particular, the regulatory measures and guide on cross-border data transfer promulgated in 2022 has provided detailed guidance for business operators. Given that China is still in the process of completing its data security legal framework, we expect that additional regulatory rules will be rolled out to enhance data security protections.
Although China has promulgated a set of laws and regulations to establish its national security regulatory regime, the broad language of the FIL and the FISR Measures leaves ample room for regulators to apply their interpretation and clarification on the operation of China's FISR system. Finally, given the current and rapidly changing geopolitical situation, China will likely continue its efforts to promulgate additional rules to strengthen FISR implementation.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2023 White & Case LLP