Mark Davies
Biography
Overview
Mark Davies' practice focuses on appellate litigation for technology companies, particularly ones that lead the world in hardware and software innovation. He is experienced in the Federal Circuit, the D.C. Circuit, other federal and state appellate courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court. He also develops trial court legal strategy, presents policy arguments to regulatory agencies, and advises on complex global disputes.
Mark is a highly successful appellate lawyer who has argued and briefed many cases, both in private practice and government. Mark has argued 50 appellate cases, including multiple arguments for one of the world's leading high-technology companies. He has handled many appeals for Asian and European companies in U.S. courts, including challenges to International Trade Commission actions. He has represented, often repeatedly, companies such as Bosch, Cisco, Intel, Nintendo, Nvidia, Oracle, TSMC, and Vizio. And he regularly helps defeat non-practicing entities such as Intellectual Ventures, IP Bridge, and Uniloc Corporation.
Legal 500 reports, "prominent in the high-tech field, Mark Davies...is praised for his 'unparalleled Federal Circuit experience.'" An interviewee noted that he "'is an outstanding leader of their appellate teams, as well as a skilled and subtle advocate. He really knows the Federal Circuit. Mark also has the crucial ability to see both the big-picture forest and the technically-detailed trees at the same time, and to weave them all together into a compelling story on appeal.'"
Mark is ranked in Chambers USA for Nationwide Intellectual Property: Appellate and Nationwide Appellate Law. Chambers USA 2023 quotes an interviewee that said: "He knows the Court's history, what the best arguments would be, how to present them and how to frame the issues to maximize the chances of the Supreme Court accepting cert." Another interviewee said: "He is very responsive and thoughtful. He has a great presence, a strong command of the cases he's arguing and good rapport with judges."
Mark's practice focuses on cutting-edge legal issues of particular importance to high-technology clients, including novel issues such as patent damages, standard setting, and artificial intelligence.
He is the author of the "user manual" for Federal Circuit appeals, Patent Appeals: The Elements of Effective Advocacy in the Federal Circuit (November 2017). His cases have involved virtually every area of patent law, as well as copyright, trade secret, and trademark law.
Mark is also the author of a legal treatise Artificial Intelligence: Law & Litigation (LexisNexis/Matthew Bender May 2024).
Mark appears frequently in federal district courts, serving as legal strategist in complex intellectual property cases. In high-stakes trials, he often leads 'appellate eyes' teams to set the stage for the inevitable appellate proceedings.
He also plays an active role in the development of U.S. technology policy and has represented clients at the Department of Justice, the Commerce Department, the Federal Trade Commission, the Patent and Trademark Office, and other government agencies. His amicus briefs on behalf of various technology clients are often cited in judicial opinions.
Mark also has a strong pro bono appellate practice, representing clients in the D.C. Court of Appeals, as well as the U.S. immigration and criminal systems. He is a member of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Criminal Justice Act Panel.
Before joining White & Case, Mark co-founded a leading appellate practice, and also served as a member of the Appellate Staff of the Civil Division at the U.S. Department of Justice (1999¬2006), where he represented the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the Copyright Office, the International Trade Commission and other federal agencies before the Federal Circuit, other U.S. Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court. Mark also practiced with another major law firm appellate practice in Washington D.C.
Experience
Mark led appellate teams in the following recent or pending matters:
- A global technology company. Led the client to two major Federal Circuit victories, convincing the court that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board had erred in rejecting important patent claims involving technology created by the client that is ubiquitous in smartphones today. In one case, Mark persuaded the Court to restore patent protection for the client's key technology that allows users to freely navigate the internet and watch videos. The Court overturned the agency's denial of the client's patent application.
- A global technology company. Represented at trial by another firm, the client had prevailed on non-infringement but the judge had ruled the patent valid. On appeal, Mark was able not only to get the non-infringement verdict affirmed but persuaded the appellate court to invalidate the patent.
- Dow AgroSciences. Mark led the winning appellate team in Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, No. 13-1002 (Federal Circuit), where in a "tour de force analysis of complex claim construction issues" (Hal Wagner) the Federal Circuit agreed that Dow's next generation of herbicide-resistant crop seeds do not infringe a competitor's patent. No. 2013-1002 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 3, 2013) Articles: Dow Beats Bayer Herbicide-Resistance IP Suit In Fed. Circ.
- Dow AgroSciences. Mark led the winning appellate team in a patent action revolving around Bayer's allegations of patent infringement from Dow's next generation of herbicide-resistant crop seeds. Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, No. 13-1002 (Federal Circuit) (Oral Argument) (Opinion); Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, No. 14-1032 (Federal Circuit) (Oral Argument) (Opinion); Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, No. 15-1854 (Federal Circuit) (Oral Argument) (Opinion)
- EMC Corp. Mark led the winning appellate team that obtained the definitive pre America Invents Act opinion addressing the improper use of joinder in patent cases. In re EMC Corp., Misc. No. 142 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 29, 2013) Articles: Fed. Circ. Order May Lead To Speedier Transfer Rulings; Considerations For Early Transfers In Multidefendant Cases; EMC Says Venue Transfer Denial Treads On MDL Panel's Power; Tech Giants Back EMC In Fight Over Patent Suit Venue
- Nintendo Co. Mark led the winning appellate team that successfully defended Nintendo's most important product—the Wii. Motiva, LLC v. ITC, No. 2012-1252 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2013) Articles: Nintendo Scores Fed. Circ. Win In Wii Controller IP Row; Fed. Circ. Eyes Motiva's Wii Controller Patent Suit
- NVIDIA Corp. Mark led the winning appellate team in two high stakes appeals from an adverse International Trade Commission exclusion order. NVIDIA Corp. v. ITC, No. 10-1556 & 10-1557 (Federal Circuit) Article: NVIDIA Tells Fed. Circ. Rambus Destroyed Vital IP Docs
- NVIDIA Corp. Mark led the winning appellate team in an appeal against a patent licensing entity. BIAX Corp. v. NVIDIA Corp., No. 2012-1387 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2013)
- NVIDIA Corp. BIAX Corp. v. NVIDIA Corp., 13-1649 (Federal Circuit) (attorney fees) (Opinion) (Oral Argument)
- YOU Technology. Mark led the winning appellate team for YOU Technology, a company that provides biometric financial and marketing services to the retail sector. Excel Innovations v. You Technology, No. 08-1599 (Federal Circuit) (Opinion)
Mark's pro-bono matters include:
- Deonte Bryant v. United States, No. 14-CF-268 (2016)
- Blakney v. United States, No. 11-CF-158 (2013)
- Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan, 131 S. Ct. 2343 (2011)
- Cuellar v. United States, 553 U.S. 550 (2008)
- District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)
Panelist, "Stop and Proceed with Caution: Strategies to Address the Potential Corporate and Legal Impact of the Supreme Court Decision on Affirmative Action," Global TEC Forum: Data Boot Camp, MCCA (Minority Corporate Counsel Association) (June 2023)
Webinar presentation on "Can Our Legal System Handle Artificial Intelligence?" (March 2023)
Panelist, "The Harvard Case, the Future of Race-Conscious Admissions and Impact on the Pipeline," 2022 Creating Pathways to Diversity® Conference, MCCA (October 2022)
Panelist, "To Amicus Curiae or Not?," Lawyers for Civil Justice (LCJ) Membership Meeting (May 2018)
Speaker, "PTAB and the Courts," SAS Forum on NPE Litigation (March 2018)
Panelist, "Appellate Strategies for Special Circumstances at the Federal Circuit," 18th Annual Bench & Bar Conference, The Federal Circuit Bar Association (June 2016)
Moderator, "Global Trends in Intellectual Property Protection (TPP, etc.)," 16th Annual Bench & Bar Conference, The Federal Circuit Bar Association (June 2014)
Panelist, "Review of the October 2013 Supreme Court Term," Washington Legal Foundation (June 2014)
Artificial Intelligence: Law & Litigation, LexisNexis/Matthew Bender (May 2024)
Artificial Intelligence: The Top Law360 Guest Articles Of 2022, Law360 (December 2022)
"Fed. Circ. AI Inventor Case Offers A Glimpse Into The Future," Law360 (June 2022)
"Appellant's Brief: Writing an Answering Brief in a PatentCase," Lexis Nexis (July 2019)
"Appellant's Brief: Writing the Argument Section in aPatent Case," Lexis Nexis (July 2019)
Listed in Lawdragon 100 Leading AI & Legal Tech Advisors, 2024
BTI Client Service All-Star MVP, 2023
Ranked in Chambers USA, Nationwide: Intellectual Property: Appellate, 2023
Ranked in Chambers USA, Nationwide: Appellate Law, 2019¬2023
Recommended by Legal 500 US for Appellate, 2017, 2020-2023
Federal Circuit Bar Association Committee Individual Leadership Awards