Navigating NATO Procurement: Key Export Control Risks and Compliance Strategies for Nordic Companies

As NATO procurement expands, Nordic companies must carefully navigate the intersection between NATO acquisition processes and multiple export control regimes, including those of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union. As NATO members, companies in these countries are gaining opportunities to participate in alliance-wide procurement, but they must also ensure compliance with stringent regulations governing defense-related exports. Failure to do so can result in severe consequences, including export restrictions, substantial fines, and even criminal liability. To mitigate these risks, in-house legal and operational teams must implement robust internal controls and compliance frameworks to ensure adherence to applicable regulations. Nordic companies, particularly those in Finland and Sweden, must also address national regulatory complexities that layer additional requirements onto the broader EU and international frameworks. Understanding these national regulations and the authorities responsible for their enforcement is crucial for ensuring compliance and avoiding potential legal repercussions.

U.S. Export Control Regime

The United States imposes strict controls on the export, reexport, and transfer of dual-use and defense-related articles, services, and technology through the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). Nordic companies engaging in NATO procurement may find themselves subject to these regulations if they deal in any controlled items (for example, if they receive controlled items or manufacture controlled items), if they incorporate controlled U.S.-origin commodities or software into their products or services, or if their products or services are the direct product of certain controlled U.S. software, technology, or tooling. These regulations extend to the provision of defense services, technical assistance, or brokering of defense articles. Even indirect exposure to items subject to U.S. export controls can trigger compliance obligations, particularly when dealing with subcontractors or suppliers that fall under U.S. jurisdiction.

The principal U.S. authorities responsible for enforcing export controls include the Department of State's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) and the Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and

Security (BIS). These agencies monitor transactions to ensure that controlled items are not exported, reexported, transferred, or used in unauthorized ways. A failure to comply with these requirements can result in severe penalties, including civil fines that can reach over a million dollars (or twice the value of the transaction, whichever is greater) per violation, debarment from U.S. government contracts, denial of export privileges, and, in extreme cases, criminal prosecution of both companies and corporate officers.

UK Export Control Regime

The United States imposes strict controls on the export, reexport, and transfer of dual-use and defense-related articles, services, and technology. Nordic companies engaging in NATO procurement may find themselves subject to these regulations if they deal in any controlled items (for example, if they receive controlled items or manufacture controlled items), if they incorporate controlled U.S.-origin commodities or software into their products or services, or if their products or services are the direct product of certain controlled U.S. software, technology, or tooling. These regulations extend to the provision of defense services, technical assistance, or brokering of defense articles. Even indirect exposure to items subject to U.S. export controls can trigger compliance obligations, particularly when dealing with subcontractors or suppliers that fall under U.S. jurisdiction.

The principal U.S. authorities responsible for enforcing export controls include the Department of State's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) and the Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). These agencies monitor transactions to ensure that controlled items are not exported, reexported, transferred, or used in unauthorized ways.

A failure to comply with these requirements can result in severe penalties, including civil fines that can reach over a million dollars (or twice the value of the transaction, whichever is greater) per violation, debarment from U.S. government contracts, denial of export privileges, and, in extreme cases, criminal prosecution of both companies and corporate officers.

EU Export Control Regime

The European Union regulates military and dual-use exports through the EU Common Military List and the EU Dual-Use Regulation. Each member state implements these regulations through national laws, with oversight from the European Commission and national export control authorities.

EU export controls focus on a risk-based assessment of end users and final destinations. The EU's "catch-all" controls allow authorities to impose licensing requirements on non-listed items if they may be used for military applications, weapons proliferation, or human rights violations. Unlike the U.S. regime's strict extraterritorial application, the EU framework allows for greater flexibility, permitting member states to impose additional restrictions or exceptions based on national security interests.

Penalties for non-compliance vary by member state but can include fines, trade restrictions, and criminal liability. Nordic companies must navigate both EU-wide regulations and national-level requirements while ensuring compatibility with NATO procurement needs, particularly where U.S. and UK export laws also apply.

Key Considerations for Nordic Companies

Navigating export controls is particularly complex for Nordic companies, as they must comply with overlapping regulatory regimes at the national, EU, and international levels. Finland and Sweden, now fully integrated into NATO, face heightened scrutiny as they expand their role in defense procurement. While both countries adhere to the EU's Common Military List and Dual-Use Regulation, they also maintain distinct national procedures and enforcement mechanisms that add an additional layer of complexity. Finland's Ministry for Foreign Affairs, through its Export Control Unit, places a strong emphasis on due diligence, requiring exporters to proactively assess and report potential risks, even for non-listed items that may have military applications. Failure to proactively engage with Finnish authorities can lead to licensing delays and increased regulatory scrutiny. In Sweden, the Inspectorate of Strategic Products (ISP) oversees a comprehensive system of defense material controls, ensuring compliance not only with EU regulations but also with Sweden's broader national security objectives and international treaty obligations.

For Nordic companies participating in NATO procurement or engaging in defense-related exports, the challenge is not only understanding the nuances of U.S., UK, and EU export control laws but also navigating stringent national controls. These overlapping requirements can create potential compliance pitfalls, especially when supply chains involve U.S.-origin components or dual-use technologies subject to multiple regulatory regimes. Nordic companies must recognize that enforcement agencies in their home countries are increasingly cooperating with U.S. and EU regulators, meaning that non-compliance in one jurisdiction can lead to multi-jurisdictional enforcement actions. To remain competitive in NATO procurement and defense contracting, Nordic firms must develop comprehensive compliance strategies that integrate national and multinational requirements. This includes maintaining open communication with national authorities, implementing rigorous internal compliance programs, and continuously monitoring regulatory developments to mitigate legal and financial risks.

Five Key Action Items for Nordic Companies

Comprehensive Export Classification – Identify whether products, components, and technology fall under ITAR, EAR, UK Strategic Export Controls, the UK Dual-Use List, the EU Common Military List, or the EU Dual-Use Regulation. Misclassification can lead to costly penalties and delays in NATO procurement processes.

Supply Chain Due Diligence – Conduct thorough screening of suppliers, subcontractors, and customers to ensure that no controlled items are improperly transferred or reexported without necessary approvals. Ensure all partners comply with U.S., UK, EU, and national regulations to avoid supply chain disruptions.

Internal Compliance Program – Implement robust internal policies, training programs, and technological safeguards to prevent unauthorized exports, ensuring that employees understand and adhere to applicable regulations. Regularly update compliance programs to reflect regulatory changes and emerging enforcement trends.

Licensing and Documentation – Secure the appropriate licenses, including any necessary registrations, before engaging in any cross-border transactions and maintain detailed records to demonstrate compliance in the event of an audit or investigation. Failure to produce proper documentation is a common trigger for regulatory enforcement actions.

Regulatory Engagement and Monitoring – Stay informed of changes in U.S., UK, and EU export control laws and actively engage with regulatory authorities to clarify requirements, seek guidance, and preempt potential compliance issues. Regular engagement with national regulators can provide early warning of policy shifts that may impact NATO-related exports.

As NATO continues to modernize and expand its defense capabilities, Nordic firms must take a proactive approach in aligning their operations with U.S., UK, and EU export control regimes. By implementing strong compliance measures and addressing regulatory risks early, companies can fully capitalize on emerging opportunities while avoiding costly enforcement actions that could jeopardize their participation in NATO's supply chain.

_{White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.}

_{This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.}

_{© 2025 White & Case LLP}