Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Now in its eighth year of publication, White & Case's 2024 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews provides a comprehensive look at foreign direct investment (FDI) laws and regulations in more than 40 countries worldwide.
In this edition, we continue to offer key datapoints that can help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the new set of challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions that span multiple countries.
FDI screening is continuously evolving, in fact, maturing. Stakeholders in the process, in particular FDI regulatory authorities in allied countries, are communicating and learning from each other. It is imperative to stay on top of the FDI requirements as transactions—be it mergers and acquisitions, investments, public equity offerings, debt structurings or financial restructurings—are negotiated. Understanding the potential remedies that could be required for approval and proper allocation of FDI risk are key ingredients in avoiding unpleasant surprises related to timing, certainty and business plan execution.
The number of national FDI regimes and regulatory enhancements is growing around the world, particularly in Europe, with no harmonization in terms of process and timelines. FDI regulators, at least from allied nations, are collaborating and learning from each other.
FDI regulators interpret their jurisdiction and authority broadly, especially if they believe it is in the national interest. Many regulators have "call-in," "ex officio," or "non-notified" authority. There is increasing coordination in the European Union (EU) between FDI authorities with the support of the European Commission.
Despite increased regulation, most cross-border transactions are successfully consummated, although there has been an increase in the number of cases clearing with remedies.
The origin of the investor remains a key concern for Western regulators. For example, China and Russia are included more and more in the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' regular Q&A, asking broader and more invasive questions.
Investors conducting cross-border business need to understand FDI restrictions as they are today, and how these laws are evolving over time, to avoid disruption to realizing synergies, achieving technological development and integration, and ultimately securing liquidity.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
FDI, whether undertaken directly or indirectly, is generally allowed without restrictions or without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
Most deals are approved without mitigation, but the CFIUS landscape has continued evolving based on a combination of expanded jurisdiction, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, increased rates of mitigation, further attention on monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions.
The European Commission continues to be a driver of FDI screening across the EU, with Member States now moving toward coordinated enforcement.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and extensive interpretation of the Austrian FDI regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning of the M&A process.
The Belgian FDI screening regime entered into force in July 2023. In its early days, investors and authorities alike are coming to grips with the new regime and the guidelines that help parties navigate it.
A bill contemplating the creation of a foreign direct investment screening mechanism in Bulgaria is currently before the Bulgarian parliament.
The new Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish FDI regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
Estonia's foreign direct investment screening mechanism entered into force on September 1, 2023.
FDI deals are generally not blocked in Finland.
French FDI screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's FDI review continued in full swing in 2023, with further significant updates expected in 2024.
FDI screening in Hungary – forever changing regulation, no change in its importance.
Ireland is expected to enact its FDI screening legislation in 2024.
Italy's Golden Power Law is now more than 10 years old and is continuously expanding its reach.
The law in Latvia provides for sectoral FDI regimes for specific corporate M&A, real estate dealings and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are under the scope of review.
In 2023, Luxembourg adopted a national screening mechanism for foreign direct investments.
Malta's FDI regime regulates transactions that must be notified to the authorities and, in some cases, will be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands, complementing its existing sector-specific regulations, has introduced a general investment screening mechanism to enhance the protection of its national security across a broader range of sectors.
The foreign direct investment regime in Norway is subject to upcoming changes, with further changes expected to come.
The Polish FDI regime – ambiguous rules, no blocking decisions and evolving market practice.
In Portugal, transactions involving acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the EU or the EEA may be subject to FDI screening.
The Romanian regime regarding foreign direct investment appears to have become more stable in 2023, but continues to surprise.
Russian laws regulating foreign investments have been considerably amended in 2023 to extend the scope of the laws as well as to strengthen control in this sphere.
The new Foreign Investments Screening Act entered into force in Slovakia on March 1, 2023.
Since May 31, 2020, certain foreign investments into Slovenian companies can be subject to foreign direct investments review. Incorporation of new companies and business units can also be screened.
Certain foreign direct investments in Spain are subject to scrutiny under the Law 19/2003 (Law on the movement of capital and foreign economic transactions and on certain measures for the prevention of money laundering). These restrictions started back in 2020 and, since then, additional formalities have been introduced, specifically by the new FDI regulation, which entered into force on September 1, 2023.
In December 2023, Sweden adopted and implemented a new FDI regime, meaning that a general FDI screening mechanism now applies in relation to investments in certain Swedish businesses.
Historically, Switzerland has been very liberal regarding foreign investments. However, there has recently been increased political pressure to create a more structured legal regime for foreign investment.
Making Türkiye an attractive investment destination continues to be a priority for the government.
Foreign direct investment is permissible in the UAE, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
The UK introduced new legislation governing FDI in 2022, which also captures domestic investment in certain sectors.
The Western Balkan region (Balkan countries out of European Union) remain increasingly accessible to foreign investment, without established Foreign Direct Investment ("FDI") screening mechanism, with limited requirements for licensing approvals and ownership thresholds, apart from specific sectors.
Australia's stringent foreign investment regulations, overseen by the Treasurer and FIRB, safeguard national interests and security. The framework, including the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 and recent updates like the Australia-UK Free Trade Agreement, emphasizes transparency and accountability, with new penalties and registration requirements enhancing oversight and compliance.
While restricting the data transfer relating to national security, China issued guidelines to further optimize its foreign investment environment.
India continues to be an attractive destination for foreign investment, ranking as the world's eighth-largest recipient of FDI in 2023.
Certain businesses related to "Specifically Designated Critical Commodities" have been designated "core" sectors subject to Japan's FDI regime, FEFTA.
The Republic of Korea continues to welcome foreign investment, with the government actively seeking to ease regulations and update the regulatory framework to be in line with global standards.
After a number of years of amendments under the OIA from 2018 to 2021, New Zealand has seen a period of stabilization of the overseas investment regime. However, following the recent election and change of government in New Zealand, further changes are expected to better support investments in build-to-rent housing developments.
Taiwan continues to promote FDI under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign and PRC investors.
The Western Balkan region (Balkan countries out of European Union) remain increasingly accessible to foreign investment, without established Foreign Direct Investment ("FDI") screening mechanism, with limited requirements for licensing approvals and ownership thresholds, apart from specific sectors.
Olga Šipka and Dušan Đurić (Kinstellar) authored this publication
Western Balkan jurisdictions (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina - BH, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia) do not have a foreign investment screening regime comparable the regimes shaped by the European Union ("EU") regulations. As a result, foreign investments are allowed in most sectors without prior approval.
However, to safeguard national interests, most of these jurisdictions have established basic standards for inspecting certain sector-specific investments. This applies to sectors that are generally considered more sensitive, such as defense, banking, energy, media, real estate, and utilities. These sectors are regulated by special state laws that stipulate certain limitations for these types of foreign direct investments ("FDIs").
Despite these limitations, the Western Balkan countries promote themselves as an open and investment-friendly environment, with the aim of attracting more inbound investments from foreign investors. Nevertheless, as these countries are in the EU accession process, it is likely that comprehensive investment screening mechanisms will be implemented by these jurisdictions in the (near) future.
Depending on the relevant sectoral regulation the foreign investor is obliged to notify its investment and procure the approval from the relevant sectoral government or regulatory body prior to investing in the relevant jurisdiction. The relevant governmental body to which applications are filed is usually the state's ministry.
As previously mentioned, the review of FDI applications are required by sectoral regulation usually in sensitive sectors. For instance, prior approval is necessary for investments in the defense sector (i.e. investments in the production of arms and military equipment) in jurisdictions such as Serbia, North Macedonia, Montenegro, and BH. Screening mechanisms are also in place in the media sector in BH and in the health care sector in the North Macedonia.
Additionally, ownership threshold limitations apply to certain sectors. In Montenegro, there is a limit on the total share ownership in the defense sector for FDIs. Similarly, in Albania, this limit applies to the aircraft and ship ownership sector. Furthermore, governmental bodies in the Western Balkan countries carry out additional screening or due diligence for statistical purposes. The National Bank of Serbia conducts investment screening for statistical purposes.
In Western Balkan jurisdictions, foreign and domestic investors are mostly treated equally. Therefore, when an operating license is required, it applies to both domestic and foreign investors. However, certain sectors may prohibit foreign direct investment. For example, in Serbia and Albania, foreign investors are generally prohibited from buying agricultural land in the country, with only a few exceptions.
When required, the relevant body will review the most important aspects of the investor and their investment. This scope includes data on the investor, the value of the investment, the planned production program and the volume of production. In the defense sector, the request may be rejected if the foreign investment could have harmful consequences for defense, national and public security, or the protection of human health and the environment.
Additionally, there is often an overlap between FDI screening and other general licensing procedures, which applies to both foreign and domestic investors. Therefore, it is advisable to seek advice before investing in the Western Balkan region in the regulated sector to determine if such licensing procedure is required and whether foreign entities are entitled to such licenses, or establishing a local presence is necessary.
Review process timelines vary depending on the jurisdiction. For instance, in Serbia, upon receipt of the request (by the Ministry of Defense), the Government must issue its decision (which will be based on a proposal of the Ministry of Defense) within 120 days from the date of receipt of the request. In Kosovo, the review process is approximately three months.
The Western Balkans jurisdictions are working on promoting and welcoming foreign investors and their rights are generally well protected. Special government organizations, such as the Development Agency of Serbia, the Investment Development Agency of Albania have been stablished to support the implementation of FDI projects and assist in this process.
Several jurisdictions have established economic free zones to attract foreign investors. These zones cater to various sectors, such as logistics, industrial, or IT.
Additionally, the Western Balkan countries have implemented various investment laws aimed at encouraging economic growth, with special privileges granted to projects considered strategic investments. These investments typically include energy, infrastructure, IT, manufacturing, and similar sectors, but requirements vary across the Western Balkans.
Since the objective of the Western Balkan countries is to join the EU, their legal and regulatory framework will be aligned with the EU standards and requirements. One of the conditions is alignment with the EU's FDI regulation. While none of the Western Balkan countries have fully adopted the relevant rules, these jurisdictions are expected to, in the (near) future, further consider implementing screening mechanisms aligned with EU regulations. Kosovo is the first one aiming to reach this milestone.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2024 White & Case LLP